On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
> shared symbols that looked in "objdump -T" like:
> 0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
> 00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0
Dear all!
Now that the GFDL resolution has been done, I have the following
question:
Most (some) documents of the FSF have the following license for the
docs:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1
[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > --
> > > Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
> > > requirement? Will such architectures inde
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
> shared symbols that looked in "objdump -T" like:
> 0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
> 00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:49:39PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:00:47AM +0100]:
> > > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
> > > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
> > > complete.
> >
> > Ouch
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:00:47AM +0100]:
> > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
> > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
> > complete.
>
> Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
> developer
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 11:00 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
> developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and should
> not we a surprise. An announcement would at least give us some idea
> on when the NEW holding
On 3/13/06, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10592 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > If the ftpmasters are going to stop NEW processing for a while with or
> > without a special criteria, they should inform us through d-d-a or the
> > DPL if they think it will generate too much n
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 09:56:29PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:42:31PM -0700, John Gee wrote:
> > On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 3/13/06, John Gee < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > ---
Hello
During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with
shared symbols that looked in "objdump -T" like:
0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt
00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0 my_strntoll_8bit
00015730 gDF .text 0025 MYSQL_5.0 my_n
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 07:02:18PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> > >>Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure f
On 10592 March 1977, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> If the ftpmasters are going to stop NEW processing for a while with or
> without a special criteria, they should inform us through d-d-a or the
> DPL if they think it will generate too much noise, like these threads.
> If they did that i'm yet to hear a
On 10592 March 1977, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
Now thats just wrong.
I have a backlog, yup, but that will clear itself again in a short
timeframe.
--
bye Joerg
[Talking about Social Contract]:
We will not discriminat
Matthias Klose wrote:
Richard B. Kreckel writes:
Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play
with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
if you didn't play with it in the past five months, why would you
"play" with it now?
I didn't play wit
Le Lun 13 Mars 2006 18:38, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> #include
>
> * Goswin von Brederlow [Sun, Mar 12 2006, 03:35:42PM]:
> > I think it would be a good idea to have a general dpkg hook to
> > register a command to be run at the end of dpkg. The syntax would
> > be something like this:
> >
> > dpkg-
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ehm... all the time I talk about non-critical things! Dealing with
> success checking in merged commands would be insane, we cannot assign
> the failure to a certain package (except when there is just one, of
> course).
>
[...]
> First, if dpkg-hook is imp
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12-Mar-06, 04:22 (CST), Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
>> > function (that would take ints) is p
On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supp
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
"Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
* Package name: libtest-use-ok-perl
[...]
Description : Alternative to Test::More::use_ok
According to the Test::More documentation, it is recommended to run use_ok()
inside a BEGIN block, so f
On 10-Mar-06, 20:47 (CST), David Mosberger-Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with gcc-4.0 warnings is that you can't
> distinguish between harmless implicit function declarations and ones
> that need to be flagged.
Fix them all. There's no excuse for missing prototypes: they're trivi
On 12-Mar-06, 04:22 (CST), Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:43:34AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > This is a warning and not an error, because using one's own strdup()
> > function (that would take ints) is perfectly legal.
>
> No, it is not. At least not w
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:42:31PM -0700, John Gee wrote:
> On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/13/06, John Gee < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > > From: John Gee < [EMAIL PROT
On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/13/06, John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting namecallingTo: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
On 3/13/06, John Gee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- Forwarded message --From: John Gee <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting namecallingTo: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-- Forwarded message --From: Joh
#include
* Frank Küster [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 07:28:42PM]:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
> >> dpkg-hook --on-depends foobar ldconfig - run once before depends of foobar
> >
> > What is a depends? Do you mean depende
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Janak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rtpproxy
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/ser
* License : BSD
Description : RTP proxy for S
Hi,
* Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 19:19]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> > > > one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
> > > > I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I susp
Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 19:19]:
> > Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> > > > > one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
> > > > > I guess that one person go
#include
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 07:16:22PM]:
> > What is a depends? Do you mean dependency or dependents?
> > Further, I would not depend on package installation operations but
> > instead invent something like "dpkg-hook --execute ldconfig" to run
> > outstanding tasks noted under
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:20:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Matthew R. Dempsky, le Sun 12 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0600, a écrit :
> > gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
>
> Or better, -fno-hosted and -fhosted...
What makes those options better in this situation?
--
T
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:23:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:15:30AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> > Package: devscripts
>> > Version: 2.9.15
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > I'd like to see a /u/s/d/devscripts/examples/
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
>> dpkg-hook --on-depends foobar ldconfig - run once before depends of foobar
>
> What is a depends? Do you mean dependency or dependents?
I think he means dependents: If package foo depe
Nico Golde wrote:
> > > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> > > one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
> > > I guess that one person got busy or demotivated. I suspect NEW
> >
> > Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and mann
On 3/12/06, Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month
> > ago.
> Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
I asked Joerg Jaspert abou
#include
* Goswin von Brederlow [Sun, Mar 12 2006, 03:35:42PM]:
> I think it would be a good idea to have a general dpkg hook to
> register a command to be run at the end of dpkg. The syntax would be
> something like this:
>
> dpkg-hook /usr/lib/man/update-manpages - run only once in total
> dp
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 05:23:13PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:15:30AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Package: devscripts
> > Version: 2.9.15
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > I'd like to see a /u/s/d/devscripts/examples/dev-best-practices script
> > which runs things li
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago.
> Although that doesn't explain the packages listed up top.
DWN permanently lists new packages, have this always been false positives?
Regards,
Joey
--
The only stupid question is th
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 04:13 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "David Mosberger-Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 3/11/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> > $ gcc-3.3 -c -g -O -Wall t.c
> >> > t.c: In function `foo':
> >> > t.c:4: warning: implicit declaration o
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> >>Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
> >>additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I alre
On 3/13/06, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:39:11PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
> > > > I don't think it's useful to second-guess what
On 3/13/06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > 20:38 < Ganneff> the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not
> > > process
> > > NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:39:11PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
> > > I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
> > > question to Nathanael: when did yo
On 3/13/06, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
> > I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
> > question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
> > and what was their answer?
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Janak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: radiusclient-ng
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/radiusclient-ng
* License : (BSD/MIT/X)
Desc
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 17:30 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> >This is a call for help :). If you want to help, just take over the task
> >of setting a uclibc-i386 buildd up.
> What is the need for buildd?
Basically, what is described in
http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/se
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
> additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
> have a patch for dpkg package which adds-in uclibc variants...
I hope toolchain-source mai
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 15:04 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
Also, looking at
http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=i386-uclibc
I see only binutils and gcc. In the other thread "cross-compiling Debian
packages"
I already mentioned that binutils and gcc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openspacemanager.app
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Sašo Kiselkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://openspace.adlerka.sk/
* License : GNU General Public License, version 2
Description : Workspace Manager for
Em Seg, 2006-03-13 às 15:04 +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov escreveu:
> Also, looking at
> http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=i386-uclibc
> I see only binutils and gcc. In the other thread "cross-compiling Debian
> packages"
> I already mentioned that binutils and gcc are trivial to
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>>Well, if that's the reason, are updates to existing source packages
>>still allowed? I'd really like to fix my RC bugs and sync with upstream
>>at the same time but the latter would involve so-version changes.
> This is not the reason for any backlog, although it doe
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
> To continue the "./configure in debian/rules" thread...
debian-devel is probably way too large audience, and will attract
people not interested in crosscompiling/embedded on making
unconstructive comments. lets move these threads t
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 11:22]:
>> >> > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:23:29PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > 20:38 < Ganneff> the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not process
> > NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that
> > more.
>
> Well, if that's the reason, are upd
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
>
> It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and
> *not* to [EMAIL PROTE
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> 20:38 < Ganneff> the archive grow too fast too big. so i should not process
> NEW so fast to not grow much more in a short term. something like that more.
Well, if that's the reason, are updates to existing source packages
still allowed? I'd really like to fix my RC bug
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 11:22]:
> >> > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
> >> > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until
Riku Voipio wrote:
[2] http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html
This one looks dead.
I understand we live in a gentoo-driven 0-day bleeding edge culture, but
this is quite spectacular deducment. SLIND was published exactly two
weeks ago in FOSDEM and it is already dead?
...and
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month
> > ago.
>
> Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
Different peo
> >[2] http://www.emdebian.org/slind.html
> This one looks dead.
I understand we live in a gentoo-driven 0-day bleeding edge culture, but
this is quite spectacular deducment. SLIND was published exactly two
weeks ago in FOSDEM and it is already dead?
>> ...and i386-uclibc[3] alioth project, wh
Frank Küster wrote:
> Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
>
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
> >> month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
> >> and th
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 11:22]:
>> > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
>> > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
>> > complete.
>>
>> and of course such a useless info
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
and of course such a useless information has been kept silent.
Maybe because it's simply not true?
Sow what? If this is not true, what is true and why is it kept
silent (well, IRC logs are not really but effectively silent).
I know, Martin, it is
Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
>> month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
>> and the developers reference, in the sec
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
[snip]
> >>There's also kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}, so why don't you use uclibc-i386?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Actually, I disagree. To me it makes perfect sense the way it
> >currently is, namely:
> > kernel-arch-libc
> >
> >kernel and libc c
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 11:22]:
> > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
> > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
> > complete.
>
> and of course such a useless information has been kept silent.
Maybe because it's si
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
rather that i386-hurd?
because dpkg-arc
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> you are not francois massaquoi's son
Indeed I am not. I see nothing can be hidden from you.
Rather a brilliant display of observation and deduction, actually.
I don't suppose we could interest you in a job at the Yard?
--
Henning Makholm "
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Not being a dpkg maintainer, I find this to be a gratuitous change for
no good reason (other than "it looks a bit better"). I don't see what
point it would serve.
May
Hello,
I am very interested in your product "Surfynol 104"
Could it be possible to supply me the price and MSDS for this product !
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Thank you,
G.Grigorescu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >Not being a dpkg maintainer, I find this to be a gratuitous change for
> >no good reason (other than "it looks a bit better"). I don't see what
> >point it would serve.
> Maybe the ability to run Debian on
Pjotr Kourzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0100, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386
>>> rather that i386-hurd?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>because dpkg-architecture has a line like this:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 02:09:54PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> gcc has the -fno-builtin and -fno-builtin-FUNCTION options.
Which does not change the state of a hosted compiler.
Bastian
--
Schshschshchsch.
-- The Gorn, "Arena", stardate 3046.2
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, March 13, 2006 11:20, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
>> I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
>> question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
>> and what was their answer?
>
> Is t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: goupil
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://goupil.tuxfamily.org
* License : GPL
Description : Association membership
#include
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Mon, Mar 13 2006, 11:00:47AM]:
> Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
> developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and should
> not we a surprise. An announcement would at least give us some idea
> on when the NEW holdi
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
>> Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
>> by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
>> else.
>
> The mirror split is a com
Le Lun 13 Mars 2006 10:38, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.0752
+0100]:
> > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
> > by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
> > else.
>
> The mirror s
hi,
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 11:11]:
> * Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060313 08:03]:
> > [Steinar H. Gunderson]
> > > Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
> >
> > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> > one of the
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst kirjoitti:
> I don't think it's useful to second-guess what they're doing, so my
> question to Nathanael: when did you post this question to them directly
> and what was their answer?
Is there a reason why the question should be made in private?
I
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:05:38AM +0100, Pjotr Kourzanov wrote:
Dpkg maintainer(s), what do you think is the correct procedure for
additing these things i.e., extra -vendor and -libc fields? I already
have a patch for dpkg package which adds-in uclibc variants...
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Actually, in case stockholm gets elected,
>>
>> Sorry, where's the Wiki page describing codenames for D
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
> Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
> by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
> else.
The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
the NEW
[Martin F Krafft]
> The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood,
> the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is
> complete.
Ouch. If that is true, I hope ftpmasters will announce it to the
developers, as a blocked NEW hinders development of Debian and shoul
also sprach Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.1101 +0100]:
> Has that not been announced in any public place?
Not that I know. I got this information in the "hallway track"
during FOSDEM.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. kra
On 3/13/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]:
> > Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done
> > by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone
> > else.
>
> The mirror
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 08:57 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, March 13, 2006 01:39, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> >> It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a
> >> month ago.
> >
> > Perhaps the
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
Well, that person is currently on the CeBIT and manning the Debian booth
there.
The problem in the sentence above is the singular in "that". I know that
Jörg Jaspers does a great job as ftp master assistant but didn't we
talked about the "hit by a bus
* Petter Reinholdtsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060313 08:03]:
> [Steinar H. Gunderson]
> > Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split?
>
> Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done by
> one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone else.
> I guess th
88 matches
Mail list logo
