martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.13.0752 +0100]: >> Could be, but I believe I heard that most NEW processing is done >> by one of the assistants while the mirror split is done by someone >> else. > > The mirror split is a complicated endeavour. From what I understood, > the NEW queue was put on hold on purpose until the split is > complete.
That sounds like a sensible decision, then. But why hasn't it been announced, knowing that a silent stop of NEW processing would result in many threads like this one (actually the second one I'm involved in...)? And what are the sources you got the information from? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
