Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments) should
> be done by spaces.
> Gains: shows fine in _every_ editor, no need to set tab-width.
Losses: doesn't work well with many indenting styles (e.g. it would be a
complete lose f
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 01:28 schrieb Miriam Ruiz:
> bcpp indents C/C++ source programs, replacing tabs with spaces or the
> reverse.
Yet another program that does this wrong? Indentation levels should be
represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments) should
be done by s
Would anyone in the Calgary area like to meet up for lunch and a
key-signing some time this week? The tentative location is a
restaurant, to be determined, on Ninth Avenue in Inglewood.
Please cc me in your reply. Cheers!
Shaun
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GNOME seems to be more and more focusing on the entry-level Linux user,
> and less and less on advanced users. Most unfortunate, its much prettier
> than KDE.
Indeed. Wasn't there a fork of gnome for this reason recently?
-miles
--
"Most attacks
Kevin Mark wrote:
> If 'upgrades'
> in Gnome are going to remove something, I think there should be
> something obvious like a document placed on the desktop saying
> 'gnome_2.12.2.removed.features' and explaining what was removed and how to
> work around it
> based upon the functionality in the l
I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages, which
all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a bug filed
about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spellutils
Gaetano Paolone (bigpaul) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> block 322762 with 355341
Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
Was blocked by: 189856 190020 203278 254800 254913 254924 254930 255590 256250
302504 319726 3200
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bcpp
Version : 0.0.20050725
Upstream Author : Steven De Toni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.invisible-island.net/bcpp/
* License : BSD
Description : C(++) beau
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 06:09:20PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
> A heap http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heap_%28data_structure%29 ?
> I would have assumed a like a queue, just slightly modified as to allow a
> package to be skipped temporarally.
You can have age be part of your priority in the heap :-)
"Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:42:12PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote:
I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.
Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.
Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overlo
Hi,
FrOSCon is a two-day conference on free software and open source, which
takes place on 24th and 25th June 2006 at the University of Applied
Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, in St. Augustin near Cologne, Germany.
Focus of the conference is a comprehensive range of talks about current
topics in free
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, not for handling packages the stable
release manager denys to take into a stable release.
I've not followed this bug but AIUI SRM has approved the package for the
next point release.
If the bug i
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:42:12PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote:
>I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.
>Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.
>Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overloaded?
NEW queue is actually a heap, and your package simply didn't reach the
top y
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:47:17PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, I agree with you that overruling the foundation documents is out of
> scope for the technical committee; except the tech ctte has not been asked to
> interpret or overrule the foundation documents. The Social Contract
> mandat
I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overloaded?Joop-- Linux for your hamradio desktop
___ http://www.qsl.net/pg4i/linux
Sven Luther writes:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:34:07AM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
I was wondering where I could read some goals for the Etch Decktop. What
is the plan fram here. What versions of gnome and KDE do you hope to
have. Any chance gnome 2.16 will be in Etch? :) Also what is this HA
Finally!!!
Thank you very much!
Sergio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Andi,
On Sunday, 05 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> The plan is to make s-p-u such a place, but until it happens, I think
> volatile can have such packages as an exception, if the bug is severe
> enough.
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, no
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060305 14:44]:
> * Andreas Barth [Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:16:50 +0100]:
>
> > Well, if s-p-u would *only* contained approved packages for the next
> > point release, I would agree with you. However, s-p-u contains any kind
> > of packages right now.
>
> Right, I
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:45:19PM +0530, Soumyadip Modak wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> * Package name: ldtp
>> Version : x.y.z
>> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> * URL : http://www.example.org/
>> * License
"Mad Props" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why not just buy a amd64/em64t cpu and run a 64bit kernel with 32bit
>> userland?
>>
>> Gives you all of the 4GB (minus a few pages) without hacks or extra
>> patches and without slowdowns.
>>
>> MfG
>> Goswin
>
> The 4GB Address Space thing is
* Andreas Barth [Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:16:50 +0100]:
> Well, if s-p-u would *only* contained approved packages for the next
> point release, I would agree with you. However, s-p-u contains any kind
> of packages right now.
Right, I've always thought it'd be useful to have a place to make
_accep
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060304 12:33]:
> This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said:
> > I don't see any reason accepting packages into debian-volatile, when
> > they contain no volatile data. Also if the package will be in the next
> > stable point-release i don't see any rea
Scripsit "Mad Props" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So what I need to know is whether those modifications are rather
> comprehensive/complicated or not and whether it is feasible to get finished
> within 4 month...
Debian-devel really is not the most natural place to ask such a
questions. It does not appe
> Why not just buy a amd64/em64t cpu and run a 64bit kernel with 32bit
> userland?
>
> Gives you all of the 4GB (minus a few pages) without hacks or extra
> patches and without slowdowns.
>
> MfG
> Goswin
The 4GB Address Space thing is one of the topics proposed as thesis at my
universi
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 03:45:19PM +0530, Soumyadip Modak wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: ldtp
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X,
2006/2/28, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Personally I favor using a test somebody invented an earlier time we
> discussed a similar problem: To determine whether A "requires" B for
> the purpose of the social contract, assume hypothetically that B was
> free and packaged, and then ask whet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : ldtp
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : LDTP is the Linux Desktop Testing Project
http://gnome
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 04:47:17PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If you think that Debian policy's definition of these archive sections,
> or the ftp team's implementation of it, is incompatible with the Social
> Contract, that is indeed not a technical question and it would be
> inappropriate for
29 matches
Mail list logo
