On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:13:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:23:24 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[Steve Langasek]
> >> This seems like an opportune time for someone to write a config
> >> interface for /etc/pam.d/common-*, so that we have a gener
[Marc Haber]
> If so, we need an adduser interface which properly handles LDAP and
> NIS. This is something that our current adduser does not do, and the
> corresponding bugs are open for many years.
Well, it would be nice to have, but is not really a requirement.
Those of us using LDAP and NIS ar
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:23:24 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Steve Langasek]
>> This seems like an opportune time for someone to write a config
>> interface for /etc/pam.d/common-*, so that we have a generally
>> useful means of enabling other PAM modules as well.
>
>Good id
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: flock
Version : 0.4.9
Upstream Author : Flock Inc.
* URL : http://www.flock.com/
* License : GPL under the MPL base of F
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> Do heimdal's krb4 support libraries actually implement the
Steve> same ABI as the kerberos4kth implementation? Depending on
Steve> the details, it might be better to
Steve> Provides/Conflicts/Replaces the old krb4
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:18:27PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
> Steve> wrote:
> >> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
> >> turn off krb
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman
Steve> wrote:
>> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you
>> turn off krb4?
Steve> According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:20:08PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you turn off
> krb4?
According to upstream, krb524 works without krb4 in heimdal 0.7; nothing was
said about heimdal 0.6.3 which we
It looks like some mail program can't cope with the fact I put lines
in my message body prefixed with "To:" and "CC:". Oh well.
The full message is at http://bugs.debian.org/315059>.
Looks like a Fidonet Gateway - Amazing that Fidonet is still around.
--- Begin Message ---
Topics:
Mail delive
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: colorwrapper
Version : 1.0.14
Upstream Author : vade79 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cwrapper.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Colorizer for shel
Anthony Towns writes:
> Going too far on the "consistency" side of things makes working on
> alternative OSes pointless: if Debian GNU/Linux and Debian GNU/Hurd do
> the exact same thing, why bother putting in the effort to have both?
> Would you say that "tar" shouldn't have special options on t
I'm tracking through some old bugs I submitted, cleaning up. I'd like
to close bug 256715, because jpilot and gtk-engines-smooth no longer
interact (because jpilot uses GTK+2 now). What's the appropriate
version to specify to the BTS?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature include
Does the krb524 functionality disappear from the KDC if you turn off
krb4?
If so, that will be a problem for current openafs, although probably
not for future openafs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Sempione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: keysid
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Daniele Sempione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://keysid.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Tiny linux daem
Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Package name: abakus
[...]
> Description : KDE calculator
>
> This program is a simple calculator for the KDE.
> Think of it as bc (the command-line calculator) with a nice GUI.
> It is more userfriendly and not as blindness as most other
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:33:47AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > > > Making one of the portable versions the default ping for Debian seems
> > > > > like the
> > > > > right thing to do.
> > > > Please explain why.
> > > Consistancy.
> > Losing important features to be consistent with unrel
On 23-Oct-05, 09:42 (CDT), Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 23, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Oct 23, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Making one of the portable versions the default ping
Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an
automated response and your reply will not be received.
If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following
eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or
assist
i felt that "no restrictions on the use", plus "if you distribute
the source, please make it clear which parts are mine" was enough to
imply that "use" was meant to include "modification".
We should not accept software in debian based in speculations. When it
comes to software licenses, you
On Oct 23, Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Oct 23, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Making one of the portable versions the default ping for Debian seems
> > > like the
> > > right thing to do.
> > Please explain w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: abakus
Version : 0.90
Upstream Author : Michael Pyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://grammarian.homelinux.net/abakus/
* License : GPL
Description : KDE calculator
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Oct 23, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Making one of the portable versions the default ping for Debian seems like
> > the
> > right thing to do.
> Please explain why.
Consistancy. The alternatives system could be used if someone
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
> I disagree. Where does the author say that you may modify it? I don't
> think the term
>
> > You can use it in your commercial projects.
>
> can be interpreted as "you are allowed to distribute modifications". It
> might be his inten
So it appears that the author is happy about modifications and
redistribution, and probably has it in his own interpretation of
freeware.
..
from the excerpt you provided, i think that text is quite clear already.
I disagree. Where does the author say that you may modify it? I don't
think t
hi,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> So it appears that the author is happy about modifications and
> redistribution, and probably has it in his own interpretation of
> freeware.
>
> Maybe he can be talked into removing the ambiguity and formalizing it in
> a clearer
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
> >* License : Custom license (looks like public domain to me)
> I think this is wrong.
> The readme file states:
> >This library is freeware and may be freely used and distributed.
> This fails DFSG, paragraph 3.
I think the rea
On Oct 23, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making one of the portable versions the default ping for Debian seems like
> the
> right thing to do.
Please explain why.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* License : Custom license (looks like public domain to me)
I think this is wrong.
The readme file states:
This library is freeware and may be freely used and distributed.
This fails DFSG, paragraph 3.
Willi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Oct 22, 2005, at 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the
lists unmoderated without also accepting a lot of spam. If you or
anyone else can give me a recipe
Just a few hints for the future:
- you should not cc: a wnpp bug (ITP, RFP, ...) to d-devel, because these
bugs go to d-devel anyway.
- if you want to cc: a bug submission somewhere, please use the
X-Debbugs-CC: header (read up in the bts documentation) instead of directly
cc-ing, because that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>How about naming the packages netkit-ping and iputils-ping,
>respectively? Oh, wait, we have that already...
>
>iputils-arping also has a more portable, alternative implementation
>(cf. package arping). That leaves us with tracepath that indeed appears
>to be Linux-only at
31 matches
Mail list logo
