On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
> >
> > For which the simple answer is:
> > Re
* Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:15:28 +0300]:
> El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
> > For which the simple answer is:
> > Read http://peopl
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
>
> For which the simple answer is:
> Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
I have the same questi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 305753
Bug#305753: general: 38 packages still use "Origin: debian"
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
End of message, stopping p
Agney> mass bug filling is the worst way to do this. try to send a wishlist for
Agney> lintian and linda. So on the next time that these packages use them the
Agney> mantainers will be alerted about this.
Naw, on 220098: 39 packages unnecessarily still use "Bugs:
debbugs://bugs.debian.org" I was t
> "Maciej" == Maciej Dems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maciej> I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
Maciej> Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not
Maciej> contain any invariant section have to go to non-free as
Maciej> well?
It might be better
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
>> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
>> > mirr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:24:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:26:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
A silly question to you as release manager:
What exactly are the technical reasons
I demand that Bernd Eckenfels may or may not have written...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with
>> our mirrors
> We dont need to have all architectures on all mirrors. And for the
> less-often used architectures w
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050424 00:30]:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with
> > > our
> > > mirrors due to the
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:24:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050424 00:15]:
> > Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with
> > > our
> > > mirrors due to t
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
>
> Given that - if I believe the security
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050424 00:15]:
> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
> Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - w
Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 15:18 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> If we dropped arm, it would be to drop arm, not to trade it for something --
> it's way too late to be talking about adding amd64 to the main archive for
> sarge.
Why? If the amd64 archive already uses the same sources as the main
a
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
> Given that - if I believe the security t
Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> mirrors due to the size of the archive.
Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to
provide security updates for arm, even in woo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> mirrors
We dont need to have all architectures on all mirrors. And for the
less-often used architectures we event dont need to care, since one or two
mirrors can easyly hold a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> A silly question to you as release manager:
>
>Silly indeed. Use the list archives. You cannot miss the monstruous threads
>about it.
>
>> What exactly are the techni
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:20:42PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:24:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > A silly question to you as release manager:
>
> > What exactly are the technical reasons why amd64 can't simply be shipped
> > as 12th architecture with sarge?
>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:24:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:26:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Well, the other big ones would be the installer, being synced up on sources,
> > and the ability to do point releases. It seems the first two are addressed,
> > and t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gdpc
Version : 2.2.4
Upstream Author : Jonas Frantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://koti.welho.com/jfrantz/software/gdpc.html
* License : GNU GPL
Descriptio
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I might have missed this email in the huge threads, but could you point
> me to an email explaining why increasing the archive space by less than
> 10% exacly hits a hard limit in mirror space?
No, I cannot.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 11:40:03AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > A silly question to you as release manager:
>
> Silly indeed. Use the list archives. You cannot miss the monstruous threads
> about it.
I didn't miss the threads, but much o
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> A silly question to you as release manager:
Silly indeed. Use the list archives. You cannot miss the monstruous threads
about it.
> What exactly are the technical reasons why amd64 can't simply be shipped
> as 12th architecture with sarge?
Mirror space
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:26:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Well, the other big ones would be the installer, being synced up on sources,
> and the ability to do point releases. It seems the first two are addressed,
> and the third seems to be more or less the same question as that of secu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: pystatgrab
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.i-scream.org/pystatgrab/
* License
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 07:55:52AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Andreas Jochens wrote:
> >> It will only be necessary to describe the current situation
> >> in the official release documents and include pointers
> >> to the separate amd64 archive, which will be provid
On Apr 23, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every package has certain expectations about device node names. Since devfs
> is now considered as a bad idea the naming scheme should be as well.
No, it should not.
Almost every package supports it and there is no reason to remove the
suppor
* Ralf Wildenhues
| * Tollef Fog Heen wrote on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:45:03PM CEST:
| > * Ralf Wildenhues
| >
| > | I would be much happier if someone with time would just help to put
| > | this into libtool properly as an option (and possible adjust pkg-config,
| > | FWIW). I'm pretty sure i
29 matches
Mail list logo
