* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050424 00:15]: > Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our > > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
> Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to > provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in > including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working > autobuilders just in place? Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much smaller - and AFAIK the size of the mirror pulses is the main problem. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
