On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: geramik
> Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look
This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme en
Hi,
Is it possible to configure email forwading in https://db.debian.org/
such that emails are sent to two addresses?
I tried separating two addresses with a space and also with a comma, but
it didn't seem to work.
Thanks!
Peter
亲爱的朋友：
假如您奋斗了几年还没能实现自己的理想，假如您没有更多的时间、精力、金钱去参加各种培训，那么如下个人自助培训VCD录像资料将是您最好的选择。它将是您打开财富之门、开启成功的金钥匙。每套VCD仅售50元。
1、VCD001 安东尼?罗宾：团队的力量2张
VCD002 安东尼?罗宾：突破人生的障碍1张
★当今世界一流的演讲大师,神经语言学导师,美国人心目中偶像!!!
数不清的人因接受他的
培训而脱胎换骨，强烈推荐!!
2、VCD003 陈安之： 保险行销成功秘诀(台乔治亚人寿)2张
VCD00
Dear friends , welcome to china!www.acweb.com
>>>
have you ever heard of China?
have you ever been to China?
have you some Chinese friends?
do you want to work in China?
do you want to teach Chinese students learning English?
<
Title: ???中艺网???
你好！
--- 中艺网 工艺品企业的专业电子商务网站
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
中艺网会员可得到如下服务：
获得最新资讯，中艺网的“行业快讯”、“最新资讯”、“行业综述”等栏目包含了工艺品市场的最新动态，让您最方便最及时的了解外界信息；
浏览商业机会、
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:29:38PM +0100, Aaron Isotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (sorry for the overlong subject).
>
> I originally sent this to debian-doc but I got no answers, so I
> thought I'd post it here too.
Because debian-doc was busy discussing other things and your proposed
document had not mu
Title: new page 1
恒荣国际货运有限公司 您好：
纵横科技是一家网络软件和系统开发商，秉承着"网络互动无限"的信念，以先进过硬的技术实力和孜孜不倦的做事作风，为从事国际货运企业提供开放的，安全的，稳定的，高效的电子化解决方案。
纵横科技iworks－fax系统能处理国际货运企业普遍存在的大量传真往来，完全通过b/结构的前台处理系统，支持在线收发大批量传真，传真的智能转发，传真订单的审批与回复，传真文档的智能管理、支持签章与个人签名，支持多线路的传真处理功能。是国际货运企业最理想的传真系统解决方案。解决国际货运企业普遍存在的传真处理难题。结合纵横科技i
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> 1. For package installations, DAK will inform both the uploader and the
>maintainer. For private archives should it inform the maintainer?
>Maybe a message "Your package has been installed in the private
>archive at http://...
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented
> > mess that was a total overkill for my purpose (eg. I don't need a
> > database).
>
> That "complicated and undocumented mess" has been runni
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:37:53PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
>
> IIRC, it was set in the script.
It must have gone down the drain when I removed another chunk of code that
relied on the hostname without any need.
Won't removing kernel-source-2.4.18 create a problem for other arches?
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:18:35AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Often I want to know "Should I install the unstable version or will the
> stable version be sufficient?"
>
> Currently there is no way to tell, you can't see the Changelog until after
> you have downloaded it.
It should be possible to
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:26:14AM +1100, Timshel Knoll wrote:
> 1. Put the .so symlinks in the libreiserfs-0.3-0 package. This breaks
>policy (section 9.0 says that the associated development package
>should contain the shared library without a version number). This is
>also a really b
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If there were a reliable and complete source of changelog data
> programmatically available over the network, and a means by which
> apt-listchanges could be launched by apt before any packages are downloaded,
> it would be easy to m
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:09:44PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> Which is inadequate; how do you tell whether the following lines access
> the same
> distribution?
>
> deb http://debian.lemon-computing.com/debian/ stable main contrib
> non-free
> deb http://debian.otago.ac.nz/debian/ stable main
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:03:07PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I disagree that this is needed, not for any of the usual reasons, but
> for the simple reason that this functionality already exists.
>
> The namespace of an apt repository is its URL, and any information
> available in a "Rele
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:21:09AM +, James Troup wrote:
> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I looked at katie; it seemed to be a complicated and undocumented
> > mess that was a total overkill for my purpose (eg. I don't need a
> > database).
>
> That "complicated and undocumented
Steve Dunham wrote:
>The rebuilt package is likely to have the wrong md5sum. I believe
>apt will reject it after download.
That's true but apt seems to allow Packages files without any MD5sum: info
without complaining.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There is no record of the [EMAIL PROT
[Ravindra Sunkad]
> I'm am trying to debug a memory corruption problem using
> ElectricFence 2.1 on Linux
I believe valgrind is better for this. Check out
http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/>.
Sorry, but I do not know anything about your mmap problem.
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-09 21:37]:
> IIRC, it was set in the script. I don't recall the particular reason
> why those messages weren't printed when ran on klecker, though.
Err, cause those messages break the build.
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: geramik
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=3952
* License : GPL
Description
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:42:43AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
> > and as a consequence they have no quality assurance.
>
> An offhand observation: In my experience,
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:38:49PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
IIRC, it was set in the script. I don't recall the particular reason
why those messages weren't printed when ran on klecker, though.
--
Marcelo
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:34:27PM -0600, J.E. Starr wrote:
> After using debarchiver, for the first time, yesterday, I noticed 5
> deb's didn't get placed in the archive. I unpacked the deb's and
> found they didn't have a section or priority field in the control
> file. My question is, is this
Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any plans to package the new GNU Aspell (0.50.x) for Debian?
Yes. In fact, you can find packages here if you wish to test it out and
see how it breaks gtkspell :) :
http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/
The main thing holding it back is I'm wai
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:47:07AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:22:04PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > My preferred option is 3. However, by itself it is still not sufficient
> > as it kernel-image-2.4.19-386 fails to install when making the initrd
> > image (which ironical
(In reply to Travis Crump)
Hello, and thanks for the feedback.
I think that the original is right. It speaks of the
priority assigned to an "instance" of a package (i.e.,
a particular version of that package coming from a
particular source). So although coreutils (the package)
is assigned three
Hi,
I'm am trying to debug a memory corruption problem
using ElectricFence 2.1 on Linux (2.4.2-2#1 i686) and
gcc version 2.96 2731. The program terminates with
the following error message after the it runs for
sometime. Any clues how I can get around this?
ElectricFence Exiting: mmap() failed
I am getting link errors on compiling SE Linux programs on IA64 with the
following:
cc -I../include
-I/home/etbe/selinux-small-2002102211/debian/lsm/security/selinux/include -O2
-g -L../src avc_enforcing.c -lsecure -o avc_enforcing
../src/libsecure.a(security.o): In function `security':
/hom
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-12-09 17:22]:
> Looking at the code, wnpp.pl is supposed to avoid printing those
> messages to stderr when the host is klecker.debian.org, but this
> fails for some reason.
Because $host is not initialized. I wonder where it should come from.
--
Martin Mi
Are there any plans to package the new GNU Aspell (0.50.x) for Debian?
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
> and as a consequence they have no quality assurance.
An offhand observation: In my experience, merely having bugs handled
by the BTS is no assurance of quality.
After using debarchiver, for the first time, yesterday, I noticed 5
deb's didn't
get placed in the archive. I unpacked the deb's and found they didn't
have a
section or priority field in the control file. My question is, is this
a bug? I
looked in the bts and didn't find anything listed. If
Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
Hello Josselin,
Am 10:00 2002-12-05 +0100 hat Josselin Mouette geschrieben:
>> right, but isn't that what Pre-Depends is for?
>
>The configure script is usually launched before the Pre-Depends are even
>installed. There is currently no way to ensure a package is installed at
>configuration time.
Th
Thomas Hood wrote:
If a target release has been specified, then APT uses the
following algorithm to set the priorities of the instances
of a package. Assign:
priority 100
to the instance of a package that is already
installed (if any)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:24:02AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> I just remembered that the WNPP www pages [1] have been stale
> for one month and one day now. Their last update was on November 9,
> and no one has yet looked into bug #171393: "WNPP pages are severely
> out of date. Update mechan
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: codestriker
Version : 1.6.0
Upstream Author : David Sitsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://codestriker.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A web based collabor
Hey everyone,
I just remembered that the WNPP www pages [1] have been stale
for one month and one day now. Their last update was on November 9,
and no one has yet looked into bug #171393: "WNPP pages are severely
out of date. Update mechanism broken?" which I also filed. Anyone know
what th
Michael Piefel wrote:
Is that the question that is asked again and again for all of the
dictionaries I install? No, I don't particularly like it. The questions
should only be asked once all dictionaries are there; how to do that is
beyond me.
No, what you mention is the old behavior. If you install
Am 9.12.02 um 10:30:05 schrieb Agustín Martín Domingo:
> That is already done in ispell dicts and wordlists in unstable.
> [...]
> Hope you like it
Is that the question that is asked again and again for all of the
dictionaries I install? No, I don't particularly like it. The questions
should only
Because this matter was mentioned in the 26 November Debian
Weekly News, it seems appropriate to post an update.
Susan Kleinmann took the bull by the horns and rewrote
the page from scratch. I have proposed some revisions
and hopefully we'll have a finished product soon. I
append the latest vers
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
ver
package: dhelp
severity: normal
Due to a high workload in general and other time-consuming Debian packages I
would
like to pass the maintainership for dhelp to another person/group.
There are a lot of bugs for dhelp, several of them probably outdated. Some
parts of dhelp need a complete rewrite
FROM: HON DR John cabor
>Dear Sir
A Brief Intreduction of my self, I am hon Dr John
cabora. A diplomant from the republic gabon, also the
owner of trans Atlantic crossing company.
> I am contacting in respect of your consignment /fund
that is with me as a diplomat I don`t have problem in
br
[CC to -policy removed, prolly is getting a little OT for them ...]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:06:31PM +0300, Yury Umanets wrote:
> >2. Make parted dlopen() libreiserfs-0.3.so.0 rather than libreiserfs.so.
> > This will solve the problem, but is not ideal solution since a minor
> > version upgra
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:06:41PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > I'm interested in writing the "How Software Producers can distribute
> > their products directly in .deb format" manual, as listed on
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals. I thought to write the
> > following, more or
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
| In the end it makes very little sense for a3rd party to provide
| debs. The LSB requires rpm support only. Personally I would be
| happy if they released a rpm for compliance and a tarball (binary or
| source as they wish) for everyone else.
I disagree with this, I find
- Original Message -
From: "Mikael Hedin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.devel
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 11:00 PM
Subject: [Testing] Why isn't a52dec updating
> I see that the testing scripts are running again. Now I wonder why
> a52dec isn't going in. In update_out
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 04:01:29PM +1100, Andrew Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:02:12AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I don't see why this is a problem, you'd only need to change the
dlopen() code if there's a SONAME change
Timshel Knoll wrote:
[Please CC all replies to me]
Hi all,
I'm having issues with getting parted's reiserfs support to work in a
way that complies with Debian policy. The issue is that parted dlopen()s
libreiserfs.so and libdal.so (from the libreiserfs-0.3-{0,dev}
packages) for its reiserfs support
sean finney wrote:
also, the ispell package asks you
which language you use by default. it wouldn't be so hard for these
packages to ask the same things in debconf, or at least respect your
debconf settings, and considering that they ship with stock debian you'd
think that they'd have already done
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:16, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > (re-arranged a little)
> >
> > Alastair, did you miss the "dselect just stop (I have to C-c to
> > get out)" part of Arnaud's message? Because you can't just hang an
> > installation run becaus
Title: ???中艺网???
你好！
--- 中艺网 工艺品企业的专业电子商务网站
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
中艺网会员可得到如下服务：
获得最新资讯，中艺网的“行业快讯”、“最新资讯”、“行业综述”等栏目包含了工艺品市场的最新动态，让您最方便最及时的了解外界信息；
浏览商业机会、
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > Why noone have ever packaged the actual debian set of scritps for
> > handling archives instead?
>
> Probably because it's too complicated to be of use unless you're
> managing something on the scale of the debian archive. It
Hi
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:36:58PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> I have a set of scripts for creating private debian package pools,
> available at:
>
> http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/bin2/>.
Interesting.
> These scripts will allow you to create and maintain a private archive
> with m
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> It makes sense for the debian user, dont u think?
I think not. Debian packages from *anywhere* are not under control of BTS
and as a consequence they have no quality assurance. If the software is
interesting for Debian users it should be integrated in
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 10:48 am, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> > I do not agree with you for different reasons. First of all noone
> > forces
> > people to add private archives to their sources.list. If users do that
> > they should know tha
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 02:09, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 12:03 pm, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> > I disagree that this is needed, not for any of the usual reasons, but
> > for the simple reason that this functionality already exists.
>
> In part; it's not visible to
Title: ???中艺网???
你好！
--- 中艺网 工艺品企业的专业电子商务网站
---
http://www.ArtsOfChina.com
中艺网会员可得到如下服务：
获得最新资讯，中艺网的“行业快讯”、“最新资讯”、“行业综述”等栏目包含了工艺品市场的最新动态，让您最方便最及时的了解外界信息；
浏览商业机会、
> There is no pcmcia-modules-2.2.22-reiserfs, which looks like an
> oversight to me.
>
> install kernel-image-2.4.19-i386
> remove kernel-image-2.4.16-i386
> remove kernel-image-2.4.18-i386
>
> install kernel-source-2.4.19
> remove kernel-source-2.4.16
> remove kernel-source-2.4.18
Hmm... as
On Sunday 08 December 2002 20:00, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:03:05PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Which is why I ask for the second option -- a tarball. Let Debian,
> > Gentoo, BSD, whoever do their own packaging. This includes any of those
> > groups' users.
>
>
62 matches
Mail list logo
