On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:08:16AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > 1. For package installations, DAK will inform both the uploader and the > maintainer. For private archives should it inform the maintainer? > Maybe a message "Your package has been installed in the private > archive at http://.../ and has SE-Linux support" might be good, and > clearly indicates that the package maintainer doesn't have to panick > about a non-authorised version being uploaded to Debian. > > 2. Where is the code that moves unstable to testing? That does not > appear to be here? > > 3. Could the information in apt.conf be automatically generated from > kate.conf? It seems very much like apt.conf just duplicates > a lot of information in the Suite section of kate.conf, and I dislike > duplicating config information (it increases the chances of a > mismatch). > > 4. When installing a new package (with lisa I think), how do you specify > with component {main,contrib,non-free} it will go into? >
5. What is the dsync-flist used by mkchecksums, and where can I get it from? Google search returns nothing. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
