Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this a problem with gcc?
No, it's a problem with ogle. -mcpu=ultrasparc is like
unconditionally compiling an i386 binary for Pentium 4's only,
i.e. not a good idea. The buildd pretends it's not really an
UltraSPARC for exactly this reason.
--
Jame
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:20:14PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Lets take [EMAIL PROTECTED] of the cc list, this is not an abuse
> complaint. Lets add debian-devel since this actually is a normal
> technical question.
>
>
> Previously Kenneth H. Carpenter wrote:
> > I have been using the Debi
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:14:07PM +0100, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> [Thanks for the help, ia64 now builds fine]
>
> This time it's sparc that don't build. See the build log for details,
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ogle&ver=0.8.2-4&arch=sparc&stamp=1011076373&file=log&as=
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Brian Mays wrote:
> Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
>
> A set of pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 packages do exist. I uploaded a new set
> of these packages yesterday to sid. As for the packages in woody, I
> have no
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 21:41, Peter Cordes wrote:
> For software with problems like that all over the place, you could use
> gcc -fsigned-char [...]
Nooo! This is a bad idea, unless you're in a freestanding environment,
and even then it should be avoided. See the previous thread.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:01:35AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> > > -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> > > afterwards, but I
Thomas Bushnell writes:
> Actually, the C standard does essentially guarantee two's complement
> arithmetic. It specifies integer overflow behavior and
> signed/unsigned conversion behavior exactly.
It does for unsigned integers, but for signed integers overflow is
undefined behaviour. The clea
Title: 검색엔진 아이따따따
Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
A set of pcmcia-modules-2.2.20 packages do exist. I uploaded a new set
of these packages yesterday to sid. As for the packages in woody, I
have no control over that. I wish the archive maintainers
Title: ::: The 2002 1/4 IT Specialist Course :::
▒ 국내 최고의 CIW 국제공인 전문가들이 전수하는 생생한 실무 교육
▒ 실무 Process를 총망라하여 체계적으로 접근
▒ 다양한 Case Study와 현장 실습 등을 통한 실용적 학습 체제
▒ 6개월 간의 전문가 양성교육
노동부
지원의 고학력 미취업자 대상의 실무위주 교육
◈인터넷 비지니스 프로그래밍 교육 과정
포토샵,드림
Good grief. Can you be more constructive? Do you have a reference
that supports the claim?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:11:35AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I don't find any such mention in K&R [1978]. There is nothing I can
> > see to guarantees that MAX_
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of my initial packages was non-free (still is, although I hold out
> hope for a licence change at some point). I suggest that a better policy
> is closer to this:
>
> New maintainers applying as packagers should contribute something to
> main as
Lets take [EMAIL PROTECTED] of the cc list, this is not an abuse
complaint. Lets add debian-devel since this actually is a normal
technical question.
Previously Kenneth H. Carpenter wrote:
> I have been using the Debian distribution since it first came out, and
> I appreciate the effort that has
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
> sh is somewhat deprecated at the moment due to a required
> decision wrt. sh3/sh4 and big/little endianess. No buildd
> is currently running for binary-sh because of this. Just
> stay tuned, the port will eventually continue.
I really do not care abou
Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
>
> auric:~> madison musixtex
> musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
> powerpc, sparc
> musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | source, arm, ia64, m68k, powerp
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:06:50AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that t
===
THIS EMAIL CONIFIRMS YOUR REMOVAL FROM THE DIVX NEWS
NEWSLETTER. PLEASE READ IT FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
===
We have received your request to unsubscribe the following
email address from
===
THIS EMAIL CONIFIRMS YOUR SUBSCRIPTION TO THE DIVX NEWS
NEWSLETTER. PLEASE READ IT FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
===
Welcome and thank you for subscribing to the DivX News. We
have received a r
hallo supamann,
also sprach Anton Feldmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1356 +0100]:
> Sehr geehrte Programm bereitsteller,
^
wunderschoen. beautiful word. available-maker. tztztz
> mein Name ist Anton Feldmann. Ich hätte gerne von ihnen gewust wann
> woody
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:56:39PM +0100, Anton Feldmann wrote:
> Sehr geehrte Programm bereitsteller,
>
> mein Name ist Anton Feldmann. Ich hätte gerne von ihnen gewust wann
> woody frozen ist.
Guten Tag. This is an english-language mailing list; please post in
English here.
The woody freeze
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 14:14, Mikael Hedin wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> [Thanks for the help, ia64 now builds fine]
>
> This time it's sparc that don't build. See the build log for details,
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ogle&ver=0.8.2-4&arch=sparc&stamp=1
>011076373&file=log&as=raw,
>
>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1240 +0100]:
> > pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
> > Whats up duck ?
>
> pcmcia-modules have, AFAIK, been discontinued.
There's been a pcmcia-modules relea
Hi again!
[Thanks for the help, ia64 now builds fine]
This time it's sparc that don't build. See the build log for details,
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ogle&ver=0.8.2-4&arch=sparc&stamp=1011076373&file=log&as=raw,
And a snip:
gcc -DPACKAGE=\"ogle\" -DVERSION=\"0.8.2\" -DSTDC_HEA
(english version see below)
Sie erhalten in den naechsten Minuten eine digital unterschriebene E-Mail
von einem Freemail-Anwender. Damit Ihr E-Mail-Programm den Ausweis
ueberpruefen kann, muss das "Root-Zertifikat" von WEB.DE installiert sein.
Klicken Sie dazu bitte auf:
http://trust.web.de/root
Sehr geehrte Programm bereitsteller,
mein Name ist Anton Feldmann. Ich hätte gerne von ihnen gewust wann woody
frozen ist.
Gruß
Herr Anton Feldmann
Hauptstrasse 102
59302 Oelde
___
1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tipp
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Andreas,
> second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
>
> auric:~> madison musixtex
> musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
> powerpc, sparc
> musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:00:38AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> I would like to ask our release manager for more information. More
> effort is required to herd the kittens.
I agree wholeheartedly with this. With previous freezes things like the
release critical bugs list have provided a pretty cl
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm excuriatingly busy with other things [0] until
> mid-February, so I just don't have time to pester three or four
> dozen people personally on a daily basis to get the release out. That
> *shouldn't* be necessary; just getting rid of the
Hello,
second call for help to compile MusixTex on all architectures:
auric:~> madison musixtex
musixtex | 1:0.98-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 | testing | source, arm, ia64, m68k, powerpc,
sparc
musixtex | 1:0.99-1 |
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1301 +0100]:
> The original plan said that base-files would still contain it. Otherwise
> we're in the situation where upgrades from potato will have /usr/doc but
> new installs of woody won't,
which is exactly what i deem the current situat
also sprach Lauri Tischler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1240 +0100]:
> pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
> Whats up duck ?
are you talking to me?
pcmcia-modules have, AFAIK, been discontinued. these days, you have to
get pcmcia-source and kernel-source, and co
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:01:35AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> > -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> > afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
>
Title: Welcome to J.T. Sterlings
J.T. Sterlings Daily Specials - January 15, 2002Our Daily Specials change once every day at Midnight, Eastern Time.
You are subscribed to J.T. Sterlings Daily Special mailings.
Visit us at www.jtsterlings.com or click below to place your order.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Softwa
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:01:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> /usr/doc has been deprecated for a long time.
The original plan said that base-files would still contain it. Otherwise
we're in the situation where upgrades from potato will have /usr/doc but
new installs of woody won't, which in t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:01:35AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> > -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> > afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Jules Bean wrote:
>...
> > officially frozen for several months but it's still possible for new
> > upstream versions of every package to enter testing.
>...
> I really don't feel in-touch with how the freeze is going, and I
> imagine that I'm not alone in that. For example, I
pcmcia-modules for kernels 2.19 and 2.20 dont exist.
Whats up duck ?
--
Lauri Tischler, Network Admin
Tel:+358-9-47846331* Mouse movement detected *
Fax:+358-9-47846500* Reboot Windows to activate changes *
Mobile: +358-40-5569010
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:00:38AM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> I would like to see weekly 'freeze update' reports, sent here, telling
> us what goals have been passed, and what the current stopping points
> are. Something like the following:
Well, the goal that was meant to have passed was "no outs
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:49:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I had a longer discussion with our release manager who said in this
> discussion that there's no progress in the freeze of woody. We won't enter
> the next stage of the freeze until the base and standard packages are in a
> releasable s
tir, 2002-01-15 kl. 07:21 skrev Joseph Carter:
> I'm sending this to debian-x on the off chance that the next person to get
> bitten by this problem will search the archives and find it. I'm not on
> debian-x, so please Cc replies if appropriate.
>
> Actually, the problem here is that Debian doe
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0413 +0100]:
> I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
> yesterday, and it's u
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
> -> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
> afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
> yesterday, and it's unlikely to have been anything else.)
>
> Below is
Justin Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Anyone know who the active maintainer is (if he/she exists?)
See bug #107808.
Basically, some people wanted to take over, and didn't.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Anyone know who the active maintainer is (if he/she exists?)
> >
>
> Have you contacted dancer directly ?
No he hasn't.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fi
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 04:26:22PM -0500, Justin Hahn wrote:
> I'm currently a user of the diskless package, and I'd like to ask the
> maintainer a couple questions. The problem is it looks like it's
> unmaintained. According to the README.Debian is used to be brian may but is
> now [EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't find any such mention in K&R [1978]. There is nothing I can
> see to guarantees that MAX_INT + 1 < 0.
K&R [1978] is not the C standard.
I'm sending this to debian-x on the off chance that the next person to get
bitten by this problem will search the archives and find it. I'm not on
debian-x, so please Cc replies if appropriate.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:33:00AM +0100, Paul Fleischer wrote:
> > > in some way. When I try to compil
48 matches
Mail list logo
