I don't find any such mention in K&R [1978]. There is nothing I can
see to guarantees that MAX_INT + 1 < 0.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:56:19AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:03:59AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > I yet have to see a machine that does not u
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> The big problem of this packaga is that it is not built from one
> upstream source, but I can not split it because this will cause big code
> duplication in the source packages. I use my software for reencoding
> Type1 fonts and installi
I just upgraded my unstable system today. In the process, my /usr/doc
-> /usr/share/doc symlink disappeared. I didn't notice till
afterwards, but I'm pretty sure that's what did it. (It was there
yesterday, and it's unlikely to have been anything else.)
Below is the diff between yesterday and t
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 11:58:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
> > packages is not helping the project.
>
> If the package is useful it is helping the users.
>
> > I wo
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:20:20PM +0100, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
> In other contexts the right solution is to make the type of the variable
> 'signed char'.
For software with problems like that all over the place, you could use
gcc -fsigned-char if you don't have time to track down the individual
b
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:51:18PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
>
> And what's more, it only indents two at a time. Heretics!
From standards.info:
For the body of the function, our recommended style looks like this:
if (x < foo (y, z))
haha = bar[4] + 5;
else
You want to
also sprach Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0305 +0100]:
> I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
> insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
> problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.
okay. what's your st
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:04:54AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> remember:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
>
> well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
> chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
> c
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> Is there a reason why the Release.gpg files for testing and unstable are
> empty?
Yes, 'twas a bug on ftp-master. I created and added the 2002 key the
other day, and tested it, but neglected to ensure the permissions were
correct so
remember:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html
well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of
chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether
chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or
whether i c
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:11:53PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> pkgDepCache cache = *cachefile;
> for (pkgCache::PkgIterator it = cache.PkgBegin(); !it.end(); it++)
> {
> if (it->CurrentState == pkgCache::State::Installed)
> {
> std::cout << it.Name() << ' ' << it.CurrentVer
søn, 2002-01-13 kl. 23:29 skrev Erich Schubert:
> > in some way. When I try to compile any program using SDL and OpenGL, the
> > window/screen shows the last image, from the OpenGL program which was
> > previous run.
>
> My first guess would be that your GL Driver is somehow broken.
> Memory prote
Is it because pkgDepCache has a virtual destructor? If so am I supposed
to subclass it or am I just using it the wrong way? (Sorry, the the
intricacies of C++ are a bit hazy for me and libapt-pkg is practically
undocumented.)
/*
* Compile it like this:
* $ c++ -O2 -Wall -s -o showpackages show
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:03:59AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > I yet have to see a machine that does not use two's complement
> > for integer arithmetic.
>
> Actually, the C standard does essentially guarantee two's complement
> arithmetic. It specifies integer overflow behavior and
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
> packages is not helping the project.
If the package is useful it is helping the users.
> I wonder if such people really know that Debian is not only about
> technique
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:41:31AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> it's unreasonable to have a nontechnical barrier to entry which doesn't
> apply to existing members.
Agreed.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:26:37PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> The big problem of this packaga is that it is not built from one
> upstream source, but I can not split it because this will cause big code
> duplication in the source packages. I use my software for reencoding
> Type1 fonts and ins
Does anyone know if Raul Miller is active ?
I and others have looked for him a bit.
He took over pdl from me a couple years ago. I'd like
to get it back (if he wants to get rid of it, of
course). I sent a mail a few days ago and didn't
hear anything.
Thanks, John
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
[...]
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> > our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
>
Debian *does* support non-free softwar
I'm currently a user of the diskless package, and I'd like to ask the
maintainer a couple questions. The problem is it looks like it's
unmaintained. According to the README.Debian is used to be brian may but is
now [EMAIL PROTECTED] - however is homepage claims he's no longer
maintaining this packa
reassign 128795 logrotate
retitle 128795 Missing directory in glob causes error, even with missingok
thanks
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:47:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I disagree, obviously. Taking this to debian-devel, since I doubt we
> can agree. Therefore quoting a fair bit as well.
Disclaimer: --- This email is NEVER sent unsolicited. THIS
IS NOT SPAM !!! You are receiving this because you have either
answered classified ad, posted to our FFA pages, are on the same opt-
in list or have sent me something in the past. If you'd like to be
removed, see instructions
Mateusz Papiernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've debianized RUST ( rust.sourceforge.net ) - a package for creating
> red hat packages, in future debs too. It is tested with lintian, and
> debian developer, I want to upload it. Honey advocate me, but we don't
> know somethink. Can we upload thi
Hi Jérôme,
Le Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant écrivait:
> Hi,
>
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
Sponsors are free to decide who they sponsor and what they sponsor.
There's no need for any new rule ...
May i let you know that when I package
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:01:37PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:58:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Why don't you "man fts_read" and implement the correct way of checking
> > > for errors?
> >
> > I believe the author wrote the original loop because the fts_
On Monday 14 January 2002 20:12, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've debianized RUST ( rust.sourceforge.net ) - a package for creating
> red hat packages, in future debs too. It is tested with lintian, and
> debian developer, I want to upload it. Honey advocate me, but we don't
> know somethink
On 12.I.2002 at 02:12 Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > I'am the maintainer of the package scalable-cyrfonts. It's purpose was
> > to contain all free scalable Cyrillic fonts I know about. However
> > recently the upstream of most of these fo
Hi!
I've debianized RUST ( rust.sourceforge.net ) - a package for creating
red hat packages, in future debs too. It is tested with lintian, and
debian developer, I want to upload it. Honey advocate me, but we don't
know somethink. Can we upload this package? I think about RPMs, I don't
know is it
--
pozdrawiam
--
Registered Linux User: 248664 | Powered by: Debian GNU/Linux Sid
Mateusz Papiernik - Maticomp XP | www.mati.rm.pl | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:23:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Moreover, the original depends on the fact that (MAX_INT + 1) < 0
> > which, though true, is a guaranteed result. Were I to be running a 64
>
> ... is not a guaranteed ...
>
>
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>> Even if you don't care about weird platforms, "x > -1" is a
>> ridiculously obscure test in this context; to achieve the same
>> effect it would be much clearer to make x unsigned and do "x <=
>> (unsigned)INT_MAX".
>
> I fi
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:51:39PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the Release.gpg files for testing and unstable are
> > empty?
>
> A bug on your end of the pipe?
>
> auric!joey(pts/0):/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming> l `locate Release.gpg`
[...]
> -rw
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:58:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why don't you "man fts_read" and implement the correct way of checking
> > for errors?
>
> I believe the author wrote the original loop because the fts_
> functions could fail to operate as expected.
Well please check if the
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:36:48PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:04:44AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [How to write bad code]
>
> Why don't you "man fts_read" and implement the correct way of checking
> for errors?
I believe the author wrote the original loop bec
Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a reason why the Release.gpg files for testing and unstable are
> empty?
A bug on your end of the pipe?
auric!joey(pts/0):/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming> l `locate Release.gpg`
-rw-r--r--1 ajt Debian240 Dec 17 21:11
/home/ajt/bleh/Release.
Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Even if you don't care about weird platforms, "x > -1" is a
> ridiculously obscure test in this context; to achieve the same effect
> it would be much clearer to make x unsigned and do "x <=
> (unsigned)INT_MAX".
I find "x <= (unsigned) INT_MAX" to be more obscure than
> "Hin-lik" == Hin-lik Hung Shell writes:
Hin-lik> Hi, I am going to upload the libcrypt-des-perl, is it ok
Hin-lik> to upload it to non-US ?
Actually, that's the only place you could put it. AFAIK, the
crypto-in-main discussion has not yet reached a conclusion.
--
Stephen
"A duck
"Vince Mulhollon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I disagree with Jérôme Marant, with evidence supporting that disagreement
> below:
This is strange that you did not even comment the first part
of my message.
--
Jérôme Marant
On 01/14/2002 10:05:52 AM af_mara wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > It's clear that free software is better than non-free software but
please
>> > don't forget that you agreed that "We will support our users who
develop
>> > and run non-free software on Debian".
>>
>> I'd l
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jérôme,
>
> > I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> > People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> > non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> > our philosophy and dedication to Free Soft
we are the World's Largest distributor of
direct company news and other business communications materials.
we can broadcast your web site news or your
business, or a new service within your business ( you can add your logo/photo to
your press release ) to every Newspaper, Magazine, Televisio
And what's more, it only indents two at a time. Heretics!
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
* Paul Martin
| reassign 128795 suck
| thanks
I disagree, obviously. Taking this to debian-devel, since I doubt we
can agree. Therefore quoting a fair bit as well.
| On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 08:32:02PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
| > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 08:51:20PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrot
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> I'm using the Wichert's script to check the integrity of the local
Sorry, wrong attribution - of course, the script is written by Anthony
Towns.
Previously Jan Niehusmann wrote:
> I'm using the Wichert's script to check the integrity of the local
> mirror, but at the moment this is not possible because auf the missing
> signature.
I never wrote such a script as far as I know :)
Wichert.
--
_
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 12:04:44AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[How to write bad code]
Why don't you "man fts_read" and implement the correct way of checking
for errors?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpuwz8FVAQoR.pgp
Description: PGP si
Hi!
Is there a reason why the Release.gpg files for testing and unstable are
empty?
I'm using the Wichert's script to check the integrity of the local
mirror, but at the moment this is not possible because auf the missing
signature.
Jan
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:23:51PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Moreover, the original depends on the fact that (MAX_INT + 1) < 0
> which, though true, is a guaranteed result. Were I to be running a 64
... is not a guaranteed ...
I yet have to see a machine that does not use two's complemen
Hi,
I had a longer discussion with our release manager who said in this
discussion that there's no progress in the freeze of woody. We won't enter
the next stage of the freeze until the base and standard packages are in a
releasable state - and the number of RC bugs in these packages is
increasing
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Softwa
On 14 Jan 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jérôme,
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
d
Since some people asked me, what happened these packages (which are still
waiting in the nonus incoming dir), we managed to put them to the official
site:
http://silcnet.org/
at the download section there is a release note, how to configure
sources.list to keep the packages up to date
(http://sil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 129025 exim
Bug#129025: general: exim crash with sig11 while getservbyname
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `exim'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
reassign 129025 exim
thanks
On 13/01/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: general
> Version: 20020113
> Severity: important
You are reporting a problem with the mail server software exim and so
this bug should reported against the package exim and not general.
> in exim-3.33/src/transports/sm
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Description: The code that runs Slashdot
Slash -- Slashdot Like Automated Storytelling Homepage -- is an architecture to
put together web sites.
It comes with functionality for posting articles, conducting polls, having
discu
ssions,
and can be ext
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
> People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
> non-free package are showing that they do not understand
> our philosophy and dedication to
Does anyone know of an :autocmd script to be included in $HOME/.vimrc and
that'd allow to automatically edit syslinux .bin files ?
If not, any hint about hwo this could be done ? Basically, vim has to mount the
file using mount -o loop and then it't give access to the various files
contained in
Am 14.01.02 um 11:17:07 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> He did reply to those patches and explained why they are currently
> not good enough. I suggest you work on improving them..
I replied to his reply. He didn't say they were »not good enough«, but
perhaps I misunderstood that. I also made an amend
Hi,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
--
Jérôme Marant
Title: 검색엔진 아이따따따
Previously Michael Piefel wrote:
> Now that you got my suggested patches for the last part of i18n for apt,
> I wonder (once again): Are you going to try to get this into woody?
He did reply to those patches and explained why they are currently
not good enough. I suggest you work on improving them
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Now that you got my suggested patches for the last part of i18n for apt,
> I wonder (once again): Are you going to try to get this into woody?
At least a test-suite would be great.
> If not, I plan to do something, I'm not sure what. I could NMU, but I
Hello Jason,
Now that you got my suggested patches for the last part of i18n for apt,
I wonder (once again): Are you going to try to get this into woody?
If not, I plan to do something, I'm not sure what. I could NMU, but I
don't like the thought. Instead, as a test balloon, I'd like to ITP
somet
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Will Lowe wrote:
> > Is there any deb available for it?
>
> Not currently. If there's a lot of demand I'll package it, but it
> seemed silly to bloat the Packages file further by making a .deb
> containing 139 lines of perl.
Why not fileing a wishlist bug against an apropriat
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:49:09PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:01:17AM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > > On 13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > | int i;
> > > | for (i = 0; i > -1
Hi,
I am going to upload the libcrypt-des-perl, is it ok to upload
it to non-US ?
Please see :
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Crypt/Crypt-DES-2.03.tar.gz
Thank you.
--
Best Regards,
Shell Hin-Lik Hung [ 熊顯力 ] | http://www.shellhung.org/
shell@ { shellhung.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:01:17AM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> > On 13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > | int i;
> > | for (i = 0; i > -1; i += 1) {
> > | // ...
> > | if (terminal_condition)
> > | break;
> > | // ...
> > | }
> > [..
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:01:17AM +0100, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> | int i;
> | for (i = 0; i > -1; i += 1) {
> | // ...
> | if (terminal_condition)
> | break;
> | // ...
> | }
> [...]
> | Moreover, i is never used. The loop co
On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:01 pm, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | int i;
> | for (i = 0; i > -1; i += 1) {
> | // ...
> | if (terminal_condition)
> | break;
> | // ...
> | }
>
> [...]
>
> | Moreover, i is never used. The loop could be reduce
On 13/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| int i;
| for (i = 0; i > -1; i += 1) {
| // ...
| if (terminal_condition)
| break;
| // ...
| }
[...]
| Moreover, i is never used. The loop could be reduced to
|
| while ((file = fts_read (dir)) != NULL) {
| // ...
| }
Those
70 matches
Mail list logo
