On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> but actually I'm going
> to do a new set tonight. (I'm working on it as we speak.)
>
Make that tomorrow. I think I can solve another of the outstanding
problems but I'm too tired to do it now.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:53:04PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > > In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To: headers,
> > > which I might note you didn't include in your message.
> >
> > Why should I, when it would be no different from my From: header?
>
> It would be in your
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:36:54PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > listed in Mail-Followup-To. The thing that bugs me about this is that mutt
> > often adds other list-readers' e-mail addresses to Mail-Followup-To,
> > effectively rendering this feature useless.
>
> try reading the FM. in mutt 1
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:26:33PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
> Not exactly. List-reply sends a reply to the list and any other people
> listed in Mail-Followup-To. The thing that bugs me about this is that mutt
> often adds other list-readers' e-mail addresses to Mail-Followup-To,
> effectivel
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> [ D-Man writes ]
> > Try mutt and its "L" command. The "L" command means "list-reply", aka
> > only send a message to the list, not to all recepients. It also sets
> > a header flag so that other well-behaved MUA's don't send you an
Thanks for the info, I actually think I understand that file now much
better. I was not reading all the way through and made some incorrect
conclusions from my incomplete understanding.
Gordon Sadler
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:08:00PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gordon Sadler w
On Thursday 04 January 2001 14:54, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Tim Bell wrote:
> > Now I'm sure Ben is plenty busy with libc6 and whatever else he does,
> > and I don't mean to blame him for this slipping through. But the
> > thought that bugs are getting closed without being fixed is worrying.
>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> REPORT shows as of now, stamped 03-Jan-2001 14:58, the following:
>
> 1.
> dpkg_1.8.0_i386.changes
> BYHAND
> dpkg-1.8.0.tar.gz byhand
> dpkg_1.8.0_i386.deb
> to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.8.0_i386.deb
> [snip]
> gcc-2.97_2.97-001230_i386.changes
> NEW to
REPORT shows as of now, stamped 03-Jan-2001 14:58, the following:
1.
dpkg_1.8.0_i386.changes
BYHAND
dpkg-1.8.0.tar.gz byhand
dpkg_1.8.0_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.8.0_i386.deb
The above says to me I should be able to find that file at that
location. However, a search of ftp.debian.org,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:56:38PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> > FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard.
> >
> > There is nothing about honoring X headers at all.
>
> I didn't say there was. Does "Mail-Copies-To:" begin with an X?
RFC 822 this time:
Brian May wrote:
> > "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Joey> Yes, you're right. What's happening is that debconf will not
> Joey> re-ask a question unless you specifically tell it to do
> Joey> so. This is generally a good thing, in this case it is
> Joey> obv
Greetings,
Does anyone know where Loic has been lately (i.e., for the past two years
or so)? AFAIK his last package upload was in November 1998, and the mail
I sent him about whether he needs help with mailx has generated no reply.
Since mailx is important, if the maintainer is indeed MIA, somebo
Tim Bell wrote:
>
> Now I'm sure Ben is plenty busy with libc6 and whatever else he does,
> and I don't mean to blame him for this slipping through. But the
> thought that bugs are getting closed without being fixed is worrying.
That's my point. A package like libc6 is burdensome. It would not b
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'd sooner killfile you than respect a lame Mail-Followup-To like this:
So you
o expect people to honor your Mail-Followup-To header, yet
o ignore mine on purpose.
Yes, please killfile me so I don't have to deal with your replies.
> The problem
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>dpkg -p dpkg |grep Depends
> Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.97), libncurses5, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
Perl is a required package, there is no need to list the dependency.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > dh_suidregister to have a versioned conflicts, but I guess that's my
> > problem, not your problem. :-)
>
> Automatic adding of a versioned conflict.. I'm suddenly extra glad none
> of my packages use debhelper.
I think debhelper should just check for the versioned con
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:47:55AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > You know, kinda like the way I went nuclear on Wichert when he broke
> > vim.
>
> Just use abiword, who's maintainer never updates it(hi gecko).
>
In gecko's defense, he has upd
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Yes, you're right. What's happening is that debconf will not
Joey> re-ask a question unless you specifically tell it to do
Joey> so. This is generally a good thing, in this case it is
Joey> obviously not right. libglide2 c
Erik Hollensbe wrote:
> And I would have never written the mail in the first place if I had felt
> that it was my system config that was causing the problem. I have been
> running almost vanilla unstable to the T since potato was unstable on this
> system, and *NEVER* had install issues like this o
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > * Make a new suidmanager package that predepends on the new line of dpkg
> > packages and, in its preinst, converts everything to use statoverride.
> > * Dpkg doesn't need any support for suidmanager conversion stuff at all.
> > * Any package that once used suidmanager
Erik wrote:
> This worries me a little. With testing now in, it seems that packages will
> only get 1% of the testing they used to before going into a "semi-stable" set
> of packages. Personaly i think that if your competent enough to fix your own
> system, you should consider following sid to he
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:23:03PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm concerned with some breakage in the man program. Here is an example:
Both it and groff are maintained by a person who just doesn't seem to give
a damn.
Let this serve as notice that I plan to take over these packages by force
in one
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:56:38PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard.
>
> There is nothing about honoring X headers at all.
I didn't say there was. Does "Mail-Copies-To:" begin with an X?
> In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To: headers,
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:19:32PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >How about reading my headers, which is all I asked for in the first place?
>
> exmh, at least, does not show Branden's X-no-cc: header; you have to scroll
> up to see it.
I was referring to the header t
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:41:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:38:13PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > and respect my Mail-Followup-To header next time.
>
> I'd sooner killfile you than respect a lame Mail-Followup-To like this:
>
> Mail-Followup-To: Peter Palfra
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:38:13PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> and respect my Mail-Followup-To header next time.
I'd sooner killfile you than respect a lame Mail-Followup-To like this:
Mail-Followup-To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
If I'm already
* Nicolás Lichtmaier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> But the worrying thing is that this bug should have been tagged as "more
> info", and the originator should have been contacted to provide that info. I
> don't think that a maintainer should close a bug report if he doesn't
> understand it, or h
>>"Philip" == Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> Maybe the fact is that there IS NO "best" mailreader for everyone, and
Philip> mailing lists should do their best to accommodate as many as possible.
There may not be a *best* newsreader (I realize that there are
unbelieve
> When you start saying "docs", you need to be more specific.
But the worrying thing is that this bug should have been tagged as "more
info", and the originator should have been contacted to provide that info. I
don't think that a maintainer should close a bug report if he doesn't
understand it,
The reason that I haven't responded to this yet is simply because I knew
it would go way off course onto a thread like this.
Personally, anything I would put into 'production' would have all of it's
servers running from-source compiled versions of the daemons it serves.
Nothing against any of you
Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Suggestions to the script are welcome, esspecially: How do I make
> debconf popup a checklist like:
Multiselect data type.
--
see shy jo
zhaoway wrote:
> when installing libglide2 which uses debconf, i gave a
> answer which causes the package failed to be installed,
> then after the batch installation, i re-run apt-get to
> install it, but it didn't ask the question again.
>
> i consider this is fault ui design. i.e., if the questi
[ D-Man writes ]
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:30:39PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > Funny, you just did exactly that. If your mailreader was better, you would
> > have a better functioning group-reply.
>
> Umm, no I wasn't complaining about my mailreader, but one that I don't
> use now. I solved
Why the hell should we go on #debian on OPN when you so much as admitted
that the ops on it have some kind of power trip: devoicing instead of
rebutting when they have an issue with what's said? If I help somebody, I
really don't want to have to stay politically correct: getting the problem
solve
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 06:16:17AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> If you want to advocate the use of unstable software, please be my
> guest... but not on #debian. it changes daily, and can potentially
> break every day, potentially disasterously. So -no-. It's NOT
> appropriate to tell people to run se
FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard.
There is nothing about honoring X headers at all. In fact, the only thing
the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To: headers, which I might note you
didn't include in your message. Basically, you're on the wrong side of
RFC 1855 on this issue and all the bit
>>"Philip" == Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> guess what?
Philip> not everyone uses mutt.
Philip> not everyone should.
Yes. Everyone knows that Gnus is the one true mail user agent.
>> "Reply-to" is meant to send a message back to the person who wrote the
>> first
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Steve Robbins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> What's up with webmin?
>
I'm still working on it. If you look in my home directory on master (I
presume from your email that you have access to Debian developer
machines.) you will see my latest efforts. They still have a few
problems whi
Hello,
What's up with webmin?
In the archives of debian-devel, I see at least
three threads that started with a message from someone
proposing to package webmin, and quickly followed by
Jaldhar H. Vyas claiming that he is working on it.
However, I can't find webmin at packages.debian.org.
In J
>>"Philip" == Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires
Philip> "annoying manual editing of addresses" to reply to the list,
Why would you need to do that? Doesn't your MUA have a wide
reply setting?
Philip> if your mailre
I'm concerned with some breakage in the man program. Here is an example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>chmod 700 .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>cp /usr/share/man/man1/ls.1.gz .
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>man -l ./ls.1.gz
man: can't chdir to /home/joey: Permission denied
man: ./ls.1.gz: Permission denied
Another exampl
Branden Robinson wrote:
>How about reading my headers, which is all I asked for in the first place?
exmh, at least, does not show Branden's X-no-cc: header; you have to scroll
up to see it. With 400+ messages per day, I'm not likely to scrutinise
headers closely. Furthermore, I make a distinct
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:57:07PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 02, Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a debconf
> >interface for configuration, cronjob or ip-up support and whatever else
> >is needed to keep an u
On Jan 02, Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a debconf
>interface for configuration, cronjob or ip-up support and whatever else
>is needed to keep an uptodate mirror.
Please don't encourage private mirrors!
I have been the
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:30:39PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> [ D-Man writes ]
> >
>
>
> > You are free to use whatever MUA you want, but don't complain to the
> > rest of us if it is broken.
>
> Funny, you just did exactly that. If your mailreader was better, you would
> have a better func
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
>
> reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> Which most MUA's respect. Even this mail was one y
> from going only to liw :)
Because fiddling with the reply-to is a horrible horribl
Hi Branden!
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:35:26PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > > From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >
> > ARGL, /
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:24:16PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:57:56PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > > For instance, if I followup to any of Branden Robinson's posts, they go
> > > > to the list only.
> >
[ D-Man writes ]
>
> A different list that I am on does the Reply-To munging. This means
> that if I hit group-reply (when I use an MUA that doesn't understand
> lists) the list will get 2 copies : 1 in the To and 1 in the CC field.
> Is this really what you want? Getting double mail on the list
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:04:07PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:57:56PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > For instance, if I followup to any of Branden Robinson's posts, they go
> > > to the list only.
> >
> > that is because both you and he are using "special" software.
>
> Le
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:35:26PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> ARGL, /me should really get glasses or whatever.
> Any reason you ignored my Mai
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:11:21PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > By making Reply-To: point to the list, you make these two different
> > commands do the same thing, thus depriving the user of the choice.
>
> There is NO "depriving of choice".
> If the recipient user wants to send to the original
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:23:55PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> the new 'testing' distribution (sid) should be even better - nearly
> all the benefits of 'unstable' but tested to at least install properly
> without error.
Wrong: unstable->sid; testing->woody.
sid/unstable will never become 't
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:57:56PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > For instance, if I followup to any of Branden Robinson's posts, they go
> > to the list only.
>
> that is because both you and he are using "special" software.
Let's find out. Miles, Branden, what MUA's do you use?
I happen to u
On 03-Jan-01, 13:26 (CST), Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> reply-to is meant to direct where you should send "replies to".
>
> And in the case of the debian mailing lists, you should "reply to" the
> list.
No, you shouldn't.
(And there lies the crux of the issue. One side things a
hi,
[no time to dig deeper, right now, bear with me]
when installing libglide2 which uses debconf, i gave a
answer which causes the package failed to be installed,
then after the batch installation, i re-run apt-get to
install it, but it didn't ask the question again.
i consider this is fault ui
Prozilla is a multi-threaded download acelerator wich uses multiple
connections to the server breaking the file in pieces and joining them
in the end. It accepts download resuming from FTP and HTTP, including
redirection. It shows its stats in a ncurses based interface or in
a gtk one.
Prozilla's
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> > I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> > discussing"
> >
> > I did not request you to Cc me.
> > But you replied to the list AND me.
>
> Because that is the most useful action for mail followups in t
[ Nathan E Norman writes ]
>...
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:11:21PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> > discussing"
> > > I did not request you to Cc me.
> > But you replied to the list AND me.
> ...
>
> Since you've set the "Reply-T
Hi!
I have just read your posting at http://www.linuxhelp.de/f/cache/260.html
There you wrote that you coded a program that
converts a .dbx
file into another format. Consequently I assume,
that you know
any resources of Outlook 5.0's .dbx format. I would
be glad if you
could mail me some go
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> I guess YOUR mailreader is "too old or disfunctional to be worth
> discussing"
>
> I did not request you to Cc me.
> But you replied to the list AND me.
Because that is the most useful action for mail followups in the absence
of other information. If yo
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 12:11:21PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> [ Miles Bader writes ]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> > > As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual
> > > editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the
> > > reason
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> > As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual
> > editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the
> > reasonable thing and assumes you want to reply to the original sender of
> > t
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:33:41PM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:59:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hey, this looks spiffy. I have something of a usage question though, in
> > regards to the 'gender' (distributed ripper/encoder) program I'm
> > scripting.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
> As opposed to the current scheme, which also requires "annoying manual
> editing of addresses" to reply to the list, if your mailreader does the
> reasonable thing and assumes you want to reply to the original sender of
> the message, in liu of a reply-to
Is it possible to set up a local mirror of testing with apt-move?
When I try this, I get errors about missing overrides files:
waller:~# apt-move -t sync
Updating Packages and override files...
Getting: distribution names
Getting: testing main Packages.gz
Getting: testing main override.gz
/indice
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:59:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey, this looks spiffy. I have something of a usage question though, in
> regards to the 'gender' (distributed ripper/encoder) program I'm
> scripting. I'd LIKE to add audio normalisation as an option, but since
> ripping and enco
[ Miles Bader writes ]
> Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> > reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> Because it's completely wrong.
>
> Doing so takes the choice of who to reply to (the sender or the list)
> out of the hands of th
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:15:42PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
> Try mutt and its "L" command. The "L" command means "list-reply", aka
> only send a message to the list, not to all recepients. It also sets
> a header flag so that other well-behaved MUA's don't send you an extra
> copy of their replies si
[ D-Man writes ]
> ...
> Try mutt and its "L" command. The "L" command means "list-reply", aka
> only send a message to the list, not to all recepients. It also sets
> a header flag so that other well-behaved MUA's don't send you an extra
> copy of their replies since you will get it on the list
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:08:25PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 3.I.2001 at 19:31 Peter Makholm wrote:
> With one exception:
> > Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a reasonable mailer.
> > People want to munge Reply-To headers to make ``reply back to the
> > list'' easy. But it
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:08:25PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Reply-To munging does not benefit the user with a reasonable mailer.
> > People want to munge Reply-To headers to make ``reply back to the
> > list'' easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two
> > separate ``re
> " " == Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I've been asked about my rsync mirror script, which is an
> extension from Joey Hess's one, on irc and here several times.
> So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a
> debconf interface for c
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:47:00PM -0200, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote:
> Normalize is a nice program that adjusts volume levels of a bunch
> of wav files, it is very useful when you want to make audio CDs from
> audio recorded from multiple sources for an example. sox provides volume
> level
On 3.I.2001 at 19:31 Peter Makholm wrote:
> Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> >
> > reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
One and the same mail can be sent to more than one mailinglists, but the
replyes usualy should go to only
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
> reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Because it's completely wrong.
Doing so takes the choice of who to reply to (the sender or the list)
out of the hands of the reader [at least without annoying man
Now it's my unavoidable duty to find out what has caused me to file this
bug.
Thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which reminds me, why doesn't this list just set:
>
> reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Please read "``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful" http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
It should say it all.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 07:54:27AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I suspect most people's MUA's don't display non-standard headers by default
> > (I'm pretty sure mutt, pine, evolution, and elm as configured by default
> > don't... and the lame copy of Eudo
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Adi Stav wrote:
> I've had similar thoughts, and I thought that perhaps some of
> functions of installation scripts can be replaced by hook scripts that
> dpkg would run.
Something like this is planned for dpkg 1.9, currently in development in cvs.
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
This is the sdl-port of Abuse. It will solve the "8-bit only"-problem, if I
can make it compile. ;)
Anyway, it was downloaded from http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~trandor/
and license is GPL.
--
Arto Jantunen
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Oh, and just to chime in on this little bit, I did not start maintaining
> glibc until Aug 31, 2000 (my first changelog entry). So no, I have not
> been sitting on this for 7 months. Get your facts straight.
I'm really ashamed, Ben. Sorry, sorry, sorry. :{
--
Eray (exa) O
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:53:46PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Since the latest update of glibc (libc6-2.2-8) in unstable, several
> games, such as ut436, gltron, terminus ceased to work, exiting with a
> SIGSEGV error. What up?
I'm seeing this as well. Reverting to -5 fixed it (maybe a later v
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> WHAT TO DO:
> - Get a clue
> - Read better
Roger that.
Getting a clue:
It looks like I was having a bad day; due to the nature of hack mode
I have done it incorrectly
Reading better:
Looks like I'm still having a bad day. If I can't strcmp then how
will I rightfully
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Indeed, you should feel lucky that even the non standard
> PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP is provided by the
> implementation, even though not present in ISO/IEC 9945-1
Yep, I know what NP means. My trouble was something else but I
had thought that it w
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:40:21PM +0100, Laurent Martelli wrote:
> /usr/doc - /usr/share/doc transition problems are one consequence of
> this. If files were tagged according to some high level criterions, it
> would be easier to put change the physical location during
> installation. Setting the
Hi...
>
> Date:03 Jan 2001 17:16:44 +0100
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>
> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivery-Date: Wed Jan 3 08:17:24 2001
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTE
Ben Collins wrote:
>
>
> WOW. Go fucking figure. YOUR BUG REPORT says
>
> PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_INITIALIZER_NP
>
> while this info page shows
>
> PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP
>
argh. my first great mistake of the millenium. fuck me real hard.
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
C
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Wanted to make an ass of yourself in public, eh?
Yep.
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
>>"Eray" == Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eray> I'm sending this mail because libc maintainer seems to have closed
Eray> the bug I've issued without doing any investigation on his own.
Eray> Subject:
Eray> libc6-dev: PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_INITIALIZER_NP not d
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Could you please read the Developers Reference section 4.1 second
paragraph.
> When machines break for whatever reason, sometimes people come to
> #debian for help. It's unhelpful to encourage people to break their
> mission-critical servers... If Eric want
>
> Date:03 Jan 2001 15:23:09 +0100
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> From:Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
>
> Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you want to advocate the use of unstable software, please be
Normalize is a nice program that adjusts volume levels of a bunch
of wav files, it is very useful when you want to make audio CDs from
audio recorded from multiple sources for an example. sox provides volume
level adjusting , but normalize presents us with an easier to use interface,
and
> "Bam" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Dwayne" == Dwayne C Litzenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dwayne> So my question is: What do you wish for in a package
Dwayne> manager?
Run fast, and do not do things like update-something twice when
upgrading several packag
On 03-Jan-01, 07:41 (CST), "Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >
> > Did you do this first?
>
> No. I'm sending it here because I want it to be seen.
Why not send it the package maintainer, who can actually do something
about it, rather than whining to us?
> I've just reported what I had thought, some many many months ago,
> to be a problem. Of course, the maintainer has not done anything
> about this report for 7 months, and then he closes it like that.
> Not good.
Oh, and just to chime in on this little bit, I did not start maintaining
glibc until
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
Currently, josX is translating manpages in sections 1 and 2 to Dutch.
Upstreams maintainer is planning to translate manpages for all commonly
used standard Unix programs (excluding e.g. vi(1), including e.g. find(1)),
all syscalls, most used C libraries (,,<..
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>> From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
>ARGL, /me should really get glasses or whatever.
>Any reason you ignored my MailFup2 header?
D'oh. All things
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you want to advocate the use of unstable software, please be my guest...
> but not on #debian. it changes daily, and can potentially break every
Again, what is you right too say so other than it is you oppinion?
Hi.
If you want to advocate the use of unstable software, please be my guest...
but not on #debian. it changes daily, and can potentially break every
day, potentially disasterously. So -no-. It's NOT appropriate to tell
people to run servers on unstable software.
On the other hand... if you want
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
