Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> I've just tried to build the upcoming aptitude 0.7-1 inside a pbuilder
> >>> chroot.
> >>>
> >>> I've first recompiled the following source packages with gcc-5/5.2.1-14
> >>> respectively g++-5/5.2.1-14 and against libstdc++6/5.2.1-14 and
> >>> installed th
severity 794440 normal
thanks
There are files generated by CLI in the source code already.
So we just need to change those .cli file's timestamp to an
early time to avoid the calling of CLI at build time.
Add the following in rules file solve the problem:
override_dh_auto_build:
find $(CURDIR
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 794440 normal
Bug #794440 [src:xsd] xsd: Not build due to no codesynthesis/cli package in
debian archive
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
794440: ht
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source lava-dispatcher
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of
'lava-dispatcher'
Limit currently set to 'source':'lava-dispatcher'
> tags 791614 + pending
Bug #791614 [lava-dispatcher] lava-dispatcher: prompting due
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:35:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#792218: fixed in golang-git2go 0.0~git20150731.0.ed62fda-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792218,
regarding golang-git2go: FTBFS without networking: TestCertificateCheck,
TestRemoteConnect, .. fail
to be ma
Package: apt
Version: 1.1~exp8
Severity: grave
Hello,
this morning, apt started segfaulting out of blue. My current workaround
was to install the experimental version and run "apt-cache gencaches"
then, at least, apt-cache stopped segfaulting. But apt-get still cannot
run an update, see below, be
Package: afl
Version: 1.83b-1+b2
Severity: serious
Justification: fail to build from source
Afl currently FTBFS:
[*] Testing the CC wrapper and instrumentation output...
unset AFL_USE_ASAN AFL_USE_MSAN AFL_DEFER_FORKSRV; AFL_QUIET=1
AFL_INST_RATIO=100 AFL_PATH=. AFL_CC=clang ../afl-clang-fast
-
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:49:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794309: fixed in ironic 2015.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #794309,
regarding python-ironic: Not installable due to depends python-sqlalchemy (<<
0.10)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:49:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#791614: fixed in lava-dispatcher 2015.8-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #791614,
regarding lava-dispatcher: prompting due to modified conffiles upon initial
installation: /etc/default/tftpd-hpa
to be marked
Hi.
Please, can you take a look on the patch? It is building ok on mips now.
Thanks,
Gustavo Prado Alkmim
Bacharel em Ciência da Computação (UFLA)
Doutorando em Ciência da Computação (UNICAMP)
--
"Do que adianta para o homem ganhar o mundo e perder sua alma???"
2015-07-22 4:49 GMT-03:00 Gusta
Package: kde-window-manager
Version: 4:5.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #794102
Could it be that this is a duplicate of #793026?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Lin
I’m attaching this simple patch (created with `git diff >https.patch`).
--
Marcin
W dniu 3 sierpnia 2015 @ 04:29:36, gustavo panizzo (g...@zumbi.com.ar)
napisał(a):
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:42:18 +0200, Marcin Kulik wrote:
> These issues (https, saving to tmp file) has been addressed in 0
Followup-For: Bug #794102
Package: kde-window-manager
Package: cookiecutter
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
When running cookiecutter the aforementioned error is encountered. The entire
traceback is:
$ cookiecutter --help
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/cookiecutter", line 5, in
from pkg_resource
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:35:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#790351: fixed in boost-defaults 1.58.0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790351,
regarding boost: should be rebuilt using gcc5 to export c++11 symbols
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:42:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794352: fixed in openstack-trove 2015.1.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #794352,
regarding python-trove: Uninstallable due to python-alchemy version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:41:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794355: fixed in neutron-lbaas 2015.1.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #794355,
regarding python-neutron-lbaas: Uninstallable due to python-sqlachemy version
requirements
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:41:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794044: fixed in migrate 0.9.7-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #794044,
regarding python-migrate-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to
overwrite /usr/share/man/man1/migrate-repository.1.gz
to be
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:46:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794354: fixed in sahara 2015.1.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #794354,
regarding python-sahara: Uninstallable due to python-sqalchemy version
requirement
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:46:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794353: fixed in rally 0.0.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #794353,
regarding python-rally: Uninstallable due to python-sqlalchemy version depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:52:21 +0200
with message-id <20150803095221.gb6...@lacehammer.credativ.lan>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #767814,
regarding waagent: removes files that were installed by another package:
/lib/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.
Control: reassign -1 python-mock
❦ 3 août 2015 11:32 +0200, Wolodja Wentland :
> When running cookiecutter the aforementioned error is encountered. The entire
> traceback is:
>
> $ cookiecutter --help
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/cookiecutter", line 5, in
>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 python-mock
Bug #794461 [cookiecutter] RequirementParseError: Expected version spec in
funcsigs; python_version<"3.3" at ; python_version<"3.3"
Bug reassigned from package 'cookiecutter' to 'python-mock'.
No longer marked as found in versions cookiecutte
Your message dated Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:52:21 +0200
with message-id <20150803095221.gb6...@lacehammer.credativ.lan>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #767917,
regarding waagent: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified
by the user: /etc/init.d/waagent
to be m
Your message dated Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:52:21 +0200
with message-id <20150803095221.gb6...@lacehammer.credativ.lan>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #769690,
regarding waagent postinst script can remove configuration files in postinst
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: virtualbox
Version: 4.3.30-dfsg-1
Severity: critical
X-Debbugs-CC: j...@inutil.org
X-Debbugs-CC: r...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: frank.mehn...@oracle.com
X-Debbugs-CC: klaus.espenl...@oracle.com
(please cc people if needed
As Said in many different threads [1 bottom of the mail], Upstream
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 85 serious
Bug #85 [src:attica] attica: ftbfs with GCC-5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 777889 serious
Bug #777889 [src:grantlee] grantlee: ftbfs with GCC-5
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> sever
On 19-07-15 20:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
>>break software which is not in the Debian archive, and
On 19-07-15 20:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
>>break software which is not in the Debian archive, and
1.9.8 is a year old. In addition, 2.4 is the current version.
Failing to update breaks recovery of wallets from newer versions, and
there are quite a lot of improvements in 2.4 over 1.9.8 that should be
reviewed and included.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Revise Electrum Outdated bug to 'Serious' condition. Old
> # vulnerable software is old and NEEDS updated.
> severity 792231 serious
Bug #792231 [electrum] Electrum version 1.9.8 vulnerable, needs update
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
>
Your message dated Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:59:58 -0700
with message-id <20150803125958.GA25001@pintsize>
and subject line Bug#777956: fixed in liblastfm 1.0.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #777956,
regarding liblastfm: ftbfs with GCC-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On 03-08-15 14:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-07-15 20:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 07/03/2015 03:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>>maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
>>>
On 26-07-15 12:33, Matthias Klose wrote:
> this builds with boost1.58, but could use an update for the symbols files
As mentioned in the wrong bug (#791044), it's currently not possible to
build liblas due to uninstallable dependencies, anything build depending
on gdal will pull in libdap which li
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:58:47 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Hi there. Here’s a quick patch to fix the gcc5 build failures for the
> > ioapps package. Since upstream appears to be unmaintained and doesn’t use
> > autoconf I’m proposing a patch to modify the Makefile directly.
> > Patch is
Unfortunately there are some significant challenges with 2.0+. The primary
issue is the dependency on tlslite, which was removed from Debian
previously due to being insecure and unmaintained. In addition, quite a bit
of the certificate handling code does things incorrectly (see eg. the
certificate
On 08/03/2015 10:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Unfortunately there are some significant challenges with 2.0+. The
> primary issue is the dependency on tlslite, which was removed from
> Debian previously due to being insecure and unmaintained. In addition,
> quite a bit of the certificate handli
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:20:22 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> severity 778148 serious
Was this on purpose or the fallout of a mass change?
As I mentioned before (and confirmed now), the package does build
with gcc 5.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 21:55:59 +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> I made a patch to fix this.
> Might not be good but just fix it in experimental.
> As attachment.
Since GCC 5 is in unstable, it would be good to get the fixed package
uploaded to sid soon.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. Homepage
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 794442 794102
Bug #794442 [kwin] [kde-full] Windows frames disappears
Unable to merge bugs because:
done of #794102 is 'Scott Kitterman ' not ''
Failed to merge 794442: Did not alter merged bugs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 794442 kwin 4:5.3.2-3
Bug #794442 [kde-full] [kde-full] Windows frames disappears
Bug reassigned from package 'kde-full' to 'kwin'.
No longer marked as found in versions meta-kde/5:84.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #778148 [src:trafficserver] trafficserver: ftbfs with GCC-5
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
778148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Control: severity -1 important
On 08/03/2015 05:13 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:20:22 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> severity 778148 serious
>
> Was this on purpose or the fallout of a mass change?
fallout.
> As I mentioned before (and confirmed now), the package does
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 794102
Bug #794102 {Done: Scott Kitterman } [kwin] [kde-full]
Windows frames disappears
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #794102 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 794442 794102
Bug #794442 [kwin] [kde-full] Windows frames disappears
Bug #794442 [kwin] [kde-full] Windows frames disappears
Marked as found in versions meta-kde/5:84 and kwin/4:5.3.2-3; no longer marked
as found in versions 4:5.3.
Processing control commands:
> tags 780206 + pending
Bug #780206 [src:squashfs-tools] fix ftbfs with GCC 5 on armhf
Added tag(s) pending.
--
780206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tags 780206 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for squashfs-tools (versioned as 1:4.2+20130409-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A6801864
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 07:42:38 +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> > Hm, is this simply the effect of compiling libsearch-xapian-perl with
> > gcc5 against xapian from unstable built with gcc4.9?
> Yes - this means that xapian-core will need a library transition for the
> GCC 5 transition.
Good news: libsea
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:53:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#777854: fixed in freecraft 1:1.20-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #777854,
regarding freecraft: ftbfs with GCC-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: gimagereader
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
gimagereader fails to open and reports the following error when called from a
bash prompt.
gimagereader-gtk: symbol lookup error: gimagereader-gtk: undefined symbol:
_ZN9tesseract11TessB
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:57:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794378: fixed in libusb 2:0.1.12-27
has caused the Debian Bug report #794378,
regarding missing license in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #76 [src:apron] apron: ftbfs with GCC-5
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
76: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=76
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
being so simple to fix, wouldn't be more easy just to configure it on
config file
[api]
https://asciinema.org
I was expecting something more difficult, I will contact my sponsor to
get the fix out (for default configs)
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
keybase: http://keyb
Control: severity -1 normal
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 22:31:09 +, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> Le 2015-07-19 16:23, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> >
> >Builds fine for me in an amd64 unstable + g++-from-experimental
> >cowbuilder chroot.
> >
>
> Same here. Attached a buildlo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 791747 pending
Bug #791747 [libsfml] FTBFS with GCC 5: changes to symbols file
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
791747: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=79
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 777892 + wontfix
Bug #777892 [src:gummiboot] gummiboot: ftbfs with GCC-5
Bug #790243 [src:gummiboot] gummiboot: FTBFS with glibc 2.21 and gcc-5
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Sunday, August 02, 2015 10:03:50 PM Carlos Kosloff wrote:
> Package: partitionmanager
> Version: 1.0.3-2.1
> Severity: grave
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> * What led up to the situation?
>
> I recently updated my KDE desktop to plasma5 which entails a lot of
> changes, lots of things not working y
On 08/03/2015 10:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Unfortunately there are some significant challenges with 2.0+. The
> primary issue is the dependency on tlslite, which was removed from
> Debian previously due to being insecure and unmaintained. In addition,
> quite a bit of the certificate handli
Your message dated Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:31:01 +0200
with message-id <20150803173101.ga27...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#790295: Unable to reproduce error
has caused the Debian Bug report #790295,
regarding xbubble: FTBFS with glibc 2.21 and gcc-5
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 793842 !
Bug #793842 [src:dogecoin] dogecoin: FTBFS on big-endian architectures
Owner recorded as Keng-Yu Lin .
> owner 793841 !
Bug #793841 [src:dogecoin] dogecoin: FTBFS on arm64 and mipsel: leveldb
AtomicPointer unimplemented
Owner recor
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:50:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#794369: fixed in txsocksx 1.15.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #794369,
regarding python-txsocksx: broken by twisted 15.x internal API changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
I'm looking at Bug report # 778025, netrek-client-cow: ftbfs with GCC-5.
Looks like in addition to the -std=gnu89 work around in debian/rules
file, we also need -P gcc-5 preprocessor option in the configure phase
to work around the "The preprocessor started to emit line markers to
properly disting
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux-tools 4.0.2-1
Bug #790536 [linux-tools] FTBFS with GCC 5: comparison of constant '-1' with
boolean expression is always false
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-tools' to 'src:linux-tools'.
No longer marked as found in versions 4.0.2-1.
Ignorin
Control: reassign -1 src:linux-tools 4.0.2-1
Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream patch
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr (2015-06-29):
> Package: linux-tools
> Version: 4.0.2-1
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5
This should have been “Source: linux-tools” rather tha
On 08/03/2015 10:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> In addition,
> quite a bit of the certificate handling code does things incorrectly
> (see eg. the certificate chain verification code[1] that does not
> check the certificate purpose, allowing anyone with a valid cert to
> sign a fraudulent cert a
Control: retitle 790229 blackbox: FTBFS with and gcc-5 (symbols)
Martin Michlmayr (2015-07-07):
> retitle 790229 blackbox: FTBFS with and gcc-5
> thanks
>
> * Daniel Schepler [2015-06-27 09:17]:
> > >From my pbuilder build log, using a setup preferring glibc and gcc-defaults
> > from experiment
Processing control commands:
> retitle 790229 blackbox: FTBFS with and gcc-5 (symbols)
Bug #790229 [src:blackbox] blackbox: FTBFS with and gcc-5
Changed Bug title to 'blackbox: FTBFS with and gcc-5 (symbols)' from 'blackbox:
FTBFS with and gcc-5'
--
790229: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:10:40 -0600, Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> Whereas the corresponding pattern in configure script does not quite
> match the above ("gmp=.*2" vs "gmp=.*[02-9]") as shown here,
[..]
> Please let me know what you think about this discrepancy.
It's patched; cf.
debian/pat
Hi,
I haven't touched this:
Matthias Klose (2015-07-25):
>
> after fixing
>
> --- a/skit/plib2/load_chunk.h
> +++ b/skit/plib2/load_chunk.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ load_chunk (std::istream& s, RandomItera
> {
> while (iter != last)
> if (!(s >> *iter++)) return false;
> -return
Source: reconserver
Version: 0.10.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
Trying to look at #778103, things stopped quite soon since your
package has a build-dep on librecon-1.9-dev while the archive only
has librecon-1.10-dev.
Recording this separately from #778103 to ease tracking.
Mra
On Friday, July 24, 2015 09:02:41 PM Nicola Chiapolini wrote:
> Control: severity -1 grave
> Control: thanks
>
> I am in the same situation as Matthew and run into this when upgrading my
> testing install. To get a usable KDE back, I had to downgrade. I raised the
> severity again, this way people
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #793544 [firmware-iwlwifi] firmware-iwlwifi: iwlwifi-7265-11.ucode and
iwlwifi-7265-12.ucode missing for linux 4.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
793544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793544
Debian Bug Trackin
Control: tags -1 pending
A new version of node-coffeeify is ready for upload (can be found on
mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/node-coffeeify).
This new version requires ^1.1.0 of node-convert-source-map, so I have
updated the dependency in Debian to <<2.0.0.
Most sponsors are busy wit
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 pending
Bug #793856 [node-coffeeify] node-coffeeify: uninstallable in sid:
unsatisfiable Depends: node-convert-source-map (<< 1.0.0)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
793856: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793856
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 at 20:27 Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 10:41 AM, Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> > In addition,
> > quite a bit of the certificate handling code does things incorrectly
> > (see eg. the certificate chain verification code[1] that does not
> > check the certificate purpose,
On 08/03/2015 12:40 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
Hi Gregor,
Thanks for the quick response.
>
> It's patched; cf.
> debian/patches/001-configure-gmp-version.patch
>
I see. Looks like the patch patched the file configure, not configure.in.
>> Regardless of how the configure script is created, I
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 20:59 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> control: severity -1 serious
>
> Justification, render wireless with newer kernel totally useless on a
> lot of laptop (at least my tow laptop).
In Linux 4.0 the minimum firmware API version supported fo
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #793544 [firmware-iwlwifi] firmware-iwlwifi: iwlwifi-7265-11.ucode and
iwlwifi-7265-12.ucode missing for linux 4.0
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
793544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793544
Debian Bug Tr
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:51:46 -0600, Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.
You're welcome.
Thanks for your investigations, which led further than my initial
attempts :)
> > It's patched; cf.
> > debian/patches/001-configure-gmp-version.patch
> I see. Looks like the p
> Now that plasma 5 is in Testing, how is this working (seems fine for most)?
I tried to upgraded again today and system settings seem to work. There were
still some rough edges as covered by other bug reports (e.g. #793402) but from
my side this seems fixed.
So feel free to close the bug, if yo
Package: src:lintian
Version: 2.5.34
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5
Lintian binaries-general fail with newer gcc5.
I have already fixed. Open this bug as a reminder and for a bug number
Bastien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source lintian
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'lintian'
Limit currently set to 'source':'lintian'
> tags 794505 + pending
Bug #794505 [src:lintian] lintian: ftbfs with GCC-5
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
St
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 790703 important
Bug #790703 [systemsettings] systemsettings: Completely unusable
Bug #791606 [systemsettings] systemsettings unable to find views quits right
after start
Bug #791699 [systemsettings] systemsettings: have an empty window
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 780865 grave
Bug #780865 [openafs-modules-dkms] linux-headers-amd64: openafs-modules-dkms no
longer builds
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
780865: ht
On 01.08.2015 09:22, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Could you check with "ldd /usr/bin/qweborf".
>> That'll shows which Qt library is used.
> It's python. It uses pyqt4.
> I am attaching the ldd output for subsurface, which is a C++ thing that uses
> Qt4.
>
>> The Debian qt4-x11 build look
tags 778025 + patch
thanks
Here are fixes for the gcc-5 build issue with netrek-client-cow.
The attached patch adds the followings,
- -std=gn89 to CFLAGS in debian/rules, a work around to instruct gcc-5
to use gnu-89 semantics for inline function declarations
- -P to CPPFLAGS when checking for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 778025 + patch
Bug #778025 [src:netrek-client-cow] netrek-client-cow: ftbfs with GCC-5
Bug #790781 [src:netrek-client-cow] FTBFS with GCC 5: error: mp.h: No such file
or directory
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping pro
On 2015-04-17 11:28, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> Source: make-dfsg
> Version: 4.0-8.1
>
> When building with binutils 2.25-6, the version currently in unstable,
> it fails to build. The output is:
>
> features/archives ... FAILED (3/10 passed)
>
> It's clear
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 780865 794224
Bug #780865 [openafs-modules-dkms] linux-headers-amd64: openafs-modules-dkms no
longer builds
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #794224 is 'openafs-modules-source' not 'openafs-modules-dkms'
Failed to forcibly merg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 780865 openafs-modules-dkms no longer builds on wheezy
Bug #780865 [openafs-modules-dkms] linux-headers-amd64: openafs-modules-dkms no
longer builds
Changed Bug title to 'openafs-modules-dkms no longer builds on wheezy' from
'linux-heade
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 794224 + wheezy
Bug #794224 [openafs-modules-source] openafs-modules-source 1.6.1-3+deb7u3
fails to compile
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> severity 794224 grave
Bug #794224 [openafs-modules-source] openafs-modules-source 1.6.1-3+deb7u3
fails to com
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:54 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > When running cookiecutter the aforementioned error is encountered. The
> > entire
> > traceback is:
> >
> > $ cookiecutter --help
[…]
> > pkg_resources.RequirementParseError: Expected version spec in
> > funcsigs;python_version<"
Processing control commands:
> severtiy -1 important
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #794453 [systemd] systemd: System freezee when systemd starts
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
794453: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794453
Debian Bug Track
Control: severtiy -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Am 03.08.2015 um 10:27 schrieb Jens Stavnstrup:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 215-17
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
>
> Trying to install 220-7 and all subsequent releases.
> On 222-2 udev will not ins
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 794453 important
Bug #794453 [systemd] systemd: System freezee when systemd starts
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
794453: http://bugs.debian.or
hi,
The package is waiting under mentors.
Niels is on VAC, so please sponsor me.
Bastien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:58:37 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Package: src:libwx-perl
> > Version: 1:0.9923-4
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: sid stretch
> > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-5
>
> > The full build log can be found at:
> > http://people.debian.org/~doko/lo
Package: cython
Version: 0.21.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
currenly cython is not installable, preventing numpy to be built:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libstdc++6 : Breaks: cython (<= 0.22.1-1) but 0.22.1-1 is to be installed.
Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving up...
R
❦ 3 août 2015 23:13 +0200, Wolodja Wentland :
>> > When running cookiecutter the aforementioned error is encountered. The
>> > entire
>> > traceback is:
>> >
>> > $ cookiecutter --help
> […]
>> > pkg_resources.RequirementParseError: Expected version spec in
>> > funcsigs;python_version<"3
Le 03/08/2015 21:50, Tristan Seligmann a écrit :
>
> However, the primary issue is still dealing with tlslite somehow: I do not
> think the FTP masters / security team will be happy with me distributing an
> embedded copy of tlslite in the electrum package, and I don't feel
> comfortable maintain
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
