On 03-08-15 14:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 19-07-15 20:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 07/03/2015 03:10 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package >>> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might >>> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built >>> against these packages. >> >> Just like pktools (#791240), geographic lib doesn't have any reverse >> dependencies. We'll only need to update the symbols on all architectures >> when the new libstdc++ is moved to unstable. > > It's currently not possible to build liblas due to uninstallable > dependencies, anything build depending on gdal will pull in libdap which > libstdc++ breaks.
This is not the liblas bugreport, and fortunately geographiclib is not affects by uninstallable build dependencies, so I've uploaded geographiclib (1.43-3~exp1) to experimental with updates symbols for amd64 with GCC 5, I'll upload it to unstable after updating the symbols for the other architectures. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
