On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:40:58PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards
> Python2 packages, in details:
>
> (binary:sugar-etoys-activity)Depends->python
>
> Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.
I wo
Control: reopen -1
This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards
Python2 packages, in details:
(binary:sugar-etoys-activity)Depends->python
Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of.
[ sent again, with 7bit headers to please Debian MTAs ]
Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2020-06-06 22:16:18)
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:03:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Hi Moritz,
> >
> > Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2020-06-06 16:34:38)
> > > sugar-etoys-activity seems dead upstream the las
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:03:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2020-06-06 16:34:38)
> > sugar-etoys-activity seems dead upstream the last commit is from 2012,
> > shall we remove it?
>
> What a coincidence that you should ask today - same exact day
[ sent again, also to bugreport ]
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-06-06 17:03:08)
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2020-06-06 16:34:38)
> > sugar-etoys-activity seems dead upstream the last commit is from 2012,
> > shall we remove it?
>
> What a coincidence that you should ask today -
[ sent again, with 7bit headers to please Debian MTAs ]
Hi Moritz,
Quoting Moritz Mühlenhoff (2020-06-06 16:34:38)
> sugar-etoys-activity seems dead upstream the last commit is from 2012,
> shall we remove it?
What a coincidence that you should ask today - same exact day that a new
release of
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:54:24AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:sugar-etoys-activity
> Version: 116-7
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
>
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 f
7 matches
Mail list logo
