Rob Browning writes:
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> Yep -- I'm not sure yet, but I may lean toward providing:
>>
>> bin/guile -> ./guile-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is
>> bin/guild -> ./guild-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is
>
> OK, I think I'll have an upload this
Rob Browning writes:
> Yep -- I'm not sure yet, but I may lean toward providing:
>
> bin/guile -> ./guile-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is
> bin/guild -> ./guild-2.2 # or whatever the selected alternative is
OK, I think I'll have an upload this weekend using the built in
./con
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> It seems like simply providing the binaries with the versioned links
> would be sufficient, since guile-2.2-dev conflicts/provides
> libguile-dev, guile-2.0-dev and guile-2.2-dev can't be installed at the
> same time.
>
> I guess it's possible the alternative for "guil
Le 25/05/2019 à 01:18, Rob Browning a écrit :
> Rob Browning writes:
>
>> I'm not certain, but I'm planning to work on guile over the next week.
>> If so, I should be able to take a look.
>
> Just as an update, I obviously didn't get to it earlier this week, but
> I'm looking in to it now.
>
>
Rob Browning writes:
> I'm not certain, but I'm planning to work on guile over the next week.
> If so, I should be able to take a look.
Just as an update, I obviously didn't get to it earlier this week, but
I'm looking in to it now.
After I poke around a bit, I suspect the next step will be to
On 2019-05-03, Kari Pahula wrote:
> /usr/bin/guile uses alternatives system and the real binary is under
> /usr/lib, as well as providing /usr/bin/guile-2.2 as a symlink.
It seems like simply providing the binaries with the versioned links
would be sufficient, since guile-2.2-dev conflicts/provide
Le 16/05/2019 à 03:45, Rob Browning a écrit :
> Thibaut Paumard writes:
>
>> I'm checking your patch, which looks good (compiling guile for testing
>> takes a lot o time but the patch itself is pretty straightforward and
>> clean). Do you intend on NMUing this? Given the age of this RC bug, I
>>
Thibaut Paumard writes:
> I'm checking your patch, which looks good (compiling guile for testing
> takes a lot o time but the patch itself is pretty straightforward and
> clean). Do you intend on NMUing this? Given the age of this RC bug, I
> think you should.
I'm not certain, but I'm planning t
On Fri, 3 May 2019 23:09:33 +0300 Kari Pahula wrote:
> tags 926182 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi.
>
> /usr/bin/guile uses alternatives system and the real binary is under
> /usr/lib, as well as providing /usr/bin/guile-2.2 as a symlink.
>
> My patch gives the same treatment for the binaries in guile-
tags 926182 + patch
thanks
Hi.
/usr/bin/guile uses alternatives system and the real binary is under
/usr/lib, as well as providing /usr/bin/guile-2.2 as a symlink.
My patch gives the same treatment for the binaries in guile-2.2-dev.
diff -Nru guile-2.2-2.2.4+1/debian/changelog guile-2.2-2.2.4+1/
10 matches
Mail list logo
