Bug#925836: Your mail

2020-02-10 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 10/02/20 10:45 am, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: tags -1 - buster + sid bullseye . > > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:54:03 +1300 Amos Jeffries wrote: >> tags 925836 - sid bullseye + buster > > What's the point of tagging this bug (squid: ftbfs with GCC-9) as > affecting buster? There is no (and

Bug#925836: Your mail

2020-02-09 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: tags -1 - buster + sid bullseye . On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:54:03 +1300 Amos Jeffries wrote: > tags 925836 - sid bullseye + buster What's the point of tagging this bug (squid: ftbfs with GCC-9) as affecting buster? There is no (and never will be) gcc-9 in buster, so no need for a useless R