On 10/02/20 10:45 am, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: tags -1 - buster + sid bullseye . > > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 17:54:03 +1300 Amos Jeffries wrote: >> tags 925836 - sid bullseye + buster > > What's the point of tagging this bug (squid: ftbfs with GCC-9) as > affecting buster? There is no (and never will be) gcc-9 in buster, so no > need for a useless RC bug there. > > Andreas >
Only the buster package has any relevance to GCC-9. I expect this to impact anyone doing a partial upgrade of base system and/or compiler but not 'on hold' services. I'm not sure why this did not get closed already with the GCC-9 migration. We were asked to leave to that team. Amos
