Bug#847806: openmpi 2.0.2

2016-12-17 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17/12/2016 à 17:31, Alastair McKinstry a écrit : > I say leave until post-stretch release. I'm fixing the multiarch now > (which fixes #833728, #842881; > tagged as mpich and ldconfig bugs but in practice due to mpich being > multiarch and openmpi not). > Getting this in place by the freeze on J

Bug#847806: openmpi 2.0.2

2016-12-17 Thread Alastair McKinstry
> I actually meant the 2.0.2~gitsomething in experimental, but that > question was already answered by an upload to unstable around the time I > wrote that mail. > > I was primarily asking, if I was to look into improving that > "conditional install stuff" - should I do it in experimental or sid >

Bug#847806: openmpi 2.0.2

2016-12-17 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-12-17 15:26, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> What are the plans regarding 2.0.2? Do you expect that version to reach > >> stretch in time? Or will it be be delayed to stretch+1? > > 2.0.2 unfortunately has a SOVERSION change in two libraries, which means > it missed the transition > for str

Bug#847806: openmpi 2.0.2

2016-12-17 Thread Alastair McKinstry
> What are the plans regarding 2.0.2? Do you expect that version to reach > stretch in time? Or will it be be delayed to stretch+1? 2.0.2 unfortunately has a SOVERSION change in two libraries, which means it missed the transition for stretch (which is why I used a git snapshot of 2.0.1+, which h