On 2016-12-17 15:26, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> What are the plans regarding 2.0.2? Do you expect that version to reach > >> stretch in time? Or will it be be delayed to stretch+1? > > 2.0.2 unfortunately has a SOVERSION change in two libraries, which means > it missed the transition > for stretch (which is why I used a git snapshot of 2.0.1+, which has > some important fixes but not the ones in question, > I believe, that break the fortran ABI/API).
I actually meant the 2.0.2~gitsomething in experimental, but that question was already answered by an upload to unstable around the time I wrote that mail. I was primarily asking, if I was to look into improving that "conditional install stuff" - should I do it in experimental or sid (which is now the same version). Andreas
