Bug#831360: /usr/bin/lush must not link libbfd-*-system.so dynamically

2017-05-18 Thread 阿正
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:06:18 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: lush > Version: 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227+nmu1+b4 > Severity: grave > > /usr/bin/lush currently links libbfd dynamically. Since binutils 2.26.1, > that library went away but lush's dependency is still satisfied > resulting in a broken bi

Bug#831360: /usr/bin/lush must not link libbfd-*-system.so dynamically

2016-07-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:27:08AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > is this a problem on jessie (and wheezy), too, (the binutils-dev > description says the same thing) or could we tag this bug sid+stretch? That's a good question. I believe that the major reason for that rule is to be

Bug#831360: /usr/bin/lush must not link libbfd-*-system.so dynamically

2016-07-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:06:18 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > Package: lush > Version: 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227+nmu1+b4 > Severity: grave > > /usr/bin/lush currently links libbfd dynamically. Since binutils 2.26.1, > that library went away but lush's dependency is still satisfied > resulting in a broken b

Bug#831360: /usr/bin/lush must not link libbfd-*-system.so dynamically

2016-07-14 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: lush Version: 1.2.1-9+cvs20110227+nmu1+b4 Severity: grave /usr/bin/lush currently links libbfd dynamically. Since binutils 2.26.1, that library went away but lush's dependency is still satisfied resulting in a broken binary. Dynamically linking libbfd is not allowed (see package descripti