Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 09:26:00PM +, Cantor, Scott wrote: > On 11/9/16, 3:55 PM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of Kurt Roeckx" > behalf of k...@roeckx.be> wrote: > > > Can I just say this is really ugly code? It's called "internal", > > you really have no business of touching this. And th

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 11/9/16, 3:55 PM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of Kurt Roeckx" wrote: > Can I just say this is really ugly code? It's called "internal", > you really have no business of touching this. And that just for > some debug log. The debugging information is a minor portion of the functionality. I

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:13:58PM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > struct curl_tlssessioninfo* tlsinfo = nullptr; > CURLcode infocode = curl_easy_getinfo(ctx->m_handle, > CURLINFO_TLS_SSL_PTR, &tlsinfo); > if (infocode == CURLE_OK && tlsinfo && tlsinfo->backend ==

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 07:13:58PM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes: > > > Can you recommend a reliable way to decide whether there really are any > > conflicts between the different OpenSSL libraries used by libcurl and > > xmltooling? > > I've found two code fr

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Cantor, Scott
On 11/9/16, 1:13 PM, "Pkg-shibboleth-devel on behalf of Ferenc Wágner" wrote: >wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes: > > > Can you recommend a reliable way to decide whether there really are any >> conflicts between the different OpenSSL libraries used by libcurl and >> xmltool

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:34:32PM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Hi, > > I switched xmltooling to libssl1.0-dev just like I switched > xml-security-c beforehand. I got the following warnings: > > libtool: link: g++ -Wall -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werro

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Ferenc Wágner
wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes: > Can you recommend a reliable way to decide whether there really are any > conflicts between the different OpenSSL libraries used by libcurl and > xmltooling? I've found two code fragments which pass OpenSSL structures between curl (OpenSSL 1.1) and XMLTooli

Bug#828608: xmltooling: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-09 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Hi, I switched xmltooling to libssl1.0-dev just like I switched xml-security-c beforehand. I got the following warnings: libtool: link: g++ -Wall -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -o .libs/xmlt