On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:34:32PM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Hi, > > I switched xmltooling to libssl1.0-dev just like I switched > xml-security-c beforehand. I got the following warnings: > > libtool: link: g++ -Wall -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -O2 -DNDEBUG -Wl,-z > -Wl,relro -Wl,-z -Wl,now -o .libs/xmltoolingtest > xmltoolingtest-xmltoolingtest.o xmltoolingtest-ComplexXMLObjectTest.o > xmltoolingtest-DateTimeTest.o xmltoolingtest-ExceptionTest.o > xmltoolingtest-MarshallingTest.o xmltoolingtest-SOAPTest.o > xmltoolingtest-UnmarshallingTest.o xmltoolingtest-TemplateEngineTest.o > xmltoolingtest-EncryptionTest.o > xmltoolingtest-FilesystemCredentialResolverTest.o > xmltoolingtest-InlineKeyResolverTest.o xmltoolingtest-KeyInfoTest.o > xmltoolingtest-MemoryStorageServiceTest.o > xmltoolingtest-NonVisibleNamespaceTest.o xmltoolingtest-PKIXEngineTest.o > xmltoolingtest-SecurityHelperTest.o xmltoolingtest-SignatureTest.o -lpthread > ../xmltooling/.libs/libxmltooling.so -lxml-security-c -lssl -lcrypto > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl.so -lxerces-c -pthread > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.1.1, needed by > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl.so, may conflict with libssl.so.1.0.2 > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.1.1, needed by > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcurl.so, may conflict with libcrypto.so.1.0.2 > > Can you recommend a reliable way to decide whether there really are any > conflicts between the different OpenSSL libraries used by libcurl and > xmltooling?
I think those warnings can be ignored. What I'm confused about is why you link to libssl, and not just libcrypto. Kurt
