Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

2016-07-01 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello Dmitry, As mentioned before: the community considers this an 'optional request' not a requirement. Unless you have further comments I intend to close this bug in a few weeks. Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is d

Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

2016-06-13 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello Dmitry, On 19/04/16 23:18, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > But this requirement is not optional. License do not allow us to speculate > whether they are checking their post box or email and choose whether to > comply with this requirement... I checked and nobody is listening anymore at that email

Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

2016-04-19 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tuesday, 19 April 2016 8:49:13 AM AEST Peter Van Eynde wrote: > think you object to: > > Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested to send their > > > > name and post office or electronic mail address to: > >CommonLoops Coordinator > >Xerox PARC > > Coyote Hil

Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

2016-04-18 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello Dmitry, On 16/04/16 04:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license: > > Files: > >

Bug#821150: cmucl: non-DFSG license

2016-04-15 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Source: cmucl Version: 21a-3 Severity: serious Usertags: dfsg The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license: Files: