Hello Dmitry, On 16/04/16 04:21, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > The following files are licensed under non-DFSG compliant license: > > Files: > > <all of PCL>
> License: Xerox-LUN Checking the copy in sbcl for example is missing the clause, which I think you object to: > Any person obtaining a copy of this software is requested to send their > name and post office or electronic mail address to: > CommonLoops Coordinator > Xerox PARC > 3333 Coyote Hill Rd. > Palo Alto, CA 94304 > (or send Arpanet mail to commonloops-coordinator...@xerox.arpa) > . > Suggestions, comments and requests for improvements are also welcome. As the last release of PCL was in September 1992 and PARC stopped doing common lisp, I think that no-one is listening for any emails anymore and that we can simply remove this request. Would you agree to this? Best regards, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://pvaneynd.dreamwidth.org/ God, root, what is difference?-Pitr|God is more forgiving.-Dave Aronson|
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
