Agreed! Thanks for the backports package.
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2016, 10:14 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello:
> fixed 808433 0.8.1-1~bpo8+1
> user product...@infomaniak.com
> usertag 808433 + infomaniak.com-network
> thanks
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:01:20 +0200, S. G. wrote:
> > I'm de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 808433 0.8.1-1~bpo8+1
Bug #808433 {Done: Arnout Engelen } [nethogs] nethogs
doesn't start, saying "creating socket failed"
Bug #811273 {Done: Arnout Engelen } [nethogs] nethogs:
creating socket failed while establishing
fixed 808433 0.8.1-1~bpo8+1
user product...@infomaniak.com
usertag 808433 + infomaniak.com-network
thanks
Hi there,
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:01:20 +0200, S. G. wrote:
> I'm desparately waiting to see this fix in jessie.
>
> Is there a schedule for patching 0.8.0?
No need for a jessie-pu, the prob
I'm desparately waiting to see this fix in jessie.
Is there a schedule for patching 0.8.0?
On Thu, 26 May 2016 11:35:47 +0200 Arnout Engelen wrote:
> The actual fix is tiny:
> https://github.com/raboof/nethogs/commit/ee8b7ea8a4c6f109f8080894734bbf4d6281c809
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:30 PM,
The actual fix is tiny:
https://github.com/raboof/nethogs/commit/ee8b7ea8a4c6f109f8080894734bbf4d6281c809
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016 09:20:20 +0200 Arnout Engelen wrote:
> > Indeed looks like it. Is there anything we can do to make 0.8.1 go
> t
On Wed, 4 May 2016 09:20:20 +0200 Arnout Engelen wrote:
> Indeed looks like it. Is there anything we can do to make 0.8.1 go through
> to jessie?
Getting a new upstream version into jessie with such a large diff will
be nearly impossible. But if you can cherry-pick the actual fixes (and
nothing e
any idea if 0.8.1 go through to jessie?
many thanks
Indeed looks like it. Is there anything we can do to make 0.8.1 go through
to jessie?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Martin Maney wrote:
>
> Nothing to add, really, other than the system is amd64 and nethogs was
> installed right after updating everything else. Looks like the fix has
> just n
Nothing to add, really, other than the system is amd64 and nethogs was
installed right after updating everything else. Looks like the fix has
just never been pushed to Jessie.
Thanks!
--
The only non-renewable resource you truly have
is your time. -- Clay Johnson
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:27:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#808433: fixed in nethogs 0.8.1-0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #808433,
regarding nethogs doesn't start, saying "creating socket failed"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Control: tags 808433 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for nethogs (versioned as 0.8.1-0.3). The diff
is attached to this message.
(This is just Arnout Engelen's package from mentors, with a tiny tweak to the
changelog)
Regards.
diff -Nru nethogs-0.8.0/Changelog nethogs-0.8.1/Change
I've done a non-maintainer upload of an updated package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/nethogs
Would love for someone to sponsor the upload!
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:09 PM, S. G. wrote:
> Another +1 for fixing in Jessie.
>
> I am badly missing this tool right now.
>
> On Sun, 24 Jan 20
Another +1 for fixing in Jessie.
I am badly missing this tool right now.
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:14:29 + Chris Bainbridge
wrote:
> +1 for fixing in Jessie.
>
> Also bug #811273 appears to be a dupe of this one.
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
