On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:08:03AM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 27/08/2015 05:33, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> So quite frankly, the fact that Debian people now attack Dirk, who has
> >> been bending over backwards over these kinds
Le 27/08/2015 05:33, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> So quite frankly, the fact that Debian people now attack Dirk, who has
>> been bending over backwards over these kinds of stupidities, is not a
>> big surprise. I think it's in the Debian DNA
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So quite frankly, the fact that Debian people now attack Dirk, who has
> been bending over backwards over these kinds of stupidities, is not a
> big surprise. I think it's in the Debian DNA to care more about rules
> than about technical sani
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Mikko Rasa wrote:
>
> Have you considered in-source copies of the modified libraries?
Ehh. That's what subsurface has done since day#1 - even back when I
maintained it (long long ago), I refused to link against a dynamic
libdivecomputer, because the libdivecompute
Hello,
can we please stop?
Christoph, if you want to take over subsurface in debian you can. But
patches that need to be maintained are going to be huge; it is a lot
of work. If you don't intend to do this work you can stop using it,
compile their source code or get their binaries. Either way thi
Since these emails managed to escape my mail filters and catch my
attention, I'll butt in with my opinion. Apologies if this has been
said already.
Have you considered in-source copies of the modified libraries? Perhaps
as git submodules? If you take full control of building and installing
On 26 August, 2015 - Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
...
> > An application should be able to bring its own libraries for those
> > libraries that it is so tightly coupled with that it makes no sense
> > to
> > allow random combinations.
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 09:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Some of us have expressed our dismay with the way distributions work
> these days.
Well to be honest such dismay comes usually always from the same
fraction within open source... which is typically exactly that fraction
which tries to put mor
Quoting Dirk Hohndel (d...@hohndel.org):
> We have asked SPECIFICALLY Debian to stop providing an out-dated version
> of Subsurface to its users as that caused confusion and problems for our
> users and support burdon for us. Debian was unwilling to follow our
> choices of open source components t
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 13:40 +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> > your approach for convincing is offensive and unwise.
> Well if upstreams are effectively hostile against core paradigms of the
> FLOSS community, it must expe
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 13:40 +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> your approach for convincing is offensive and unwise.
Well if upstreams are effectively hostile against core paradigms of the
FLOSS community, it must expect that people won't be happy with it.
> as a peace of software it now no longer
On 26 August 2015 at 05:38, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> Being called stupid and arrogant is usually not a great conversation
>> opener, but hey, I've been called worse.
> Well I should have probably immediately apologised along the wa
> libgit,... well I'm not really into the subsurface code, but I never
> understood why you introduced that as a storage backend.
> Even the most prolific divers I know don't have more then 30k-50k
> dives, and usually these people stopped logging there day to day dives
> decades ago.
> Using a pl
On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 17:55 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Being called stupid and arrogant is usually not a great conversation
> opener, but hey, I've been called worse.
Well I should have probably immediately apologised along the way, just
for the sake of politeness...
But the believe to know it m
Source: subsurface
Version: 4.3-1~exp1
Severity: serious
subsurface FTBFS against recent libgit:
compiling save-git.c
save-git.c: In function 'new_directory':
save-git.c:480:2: warning: implicit declaration of function
'git_treebuilder_create' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
git_treebuilder_
15 matches
Mail list logo
