mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
774149: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: usbmount
Version: 0.0.22
Severity: impo
[image: image.png]
Ich habe mich wegen der Dringlichkeit dieser Frage entschlossen, Sie zu
kontaktieren. Ich bin Julian Marshall, Rechtsanwalt. Ich persönlich bin ein
Treuhandagent von Dr. Edwin, einem weithin bekannten unabhängigen
Auftragnehmer hier in Lome Togo, der mit seiner Frau und seiner einzigen
Tochter bei
Jürgen Braun writes:
> I'm using Debian/Stable only, therefore I cannot test this on Debian/Sid.
> My guess is, that there might be a change in ntfs-3g or systemd to fix this.
Hmmm. If that is the case, then this bug can be closed, or at least
reduced in severity, which would allow usbmount to r
Hi Dima,
I'm using Debian/Stable only, therefore I cannot test this on Debian/Sid.
My guess is, that there might be a change in ntfs-3g or systemd to fix this.
best regards,
Jürgen
Can somebody help me reproduce this bug? I'm using systemd (debian/sid)
and am mounting an ntfs usb disk using ntfs-3g. It works fine and
reliably with usbmount. Why am I not seeing breakage?
For anyone reading this bug report, dod@d.o has posted a nice summary
on how to use systemd to automatically mount a USB key:
https://ddumont.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/automount-usb-devices-with-systemd/
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Jürgen Braun wrote:
Hi all,
the Patch from Christian works for me as well with one exception. I had
to remove the file /lib/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules after creating
/etc/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules. If I do not remove the original file,
usbmount is called twice which
Hi all,
the Patch from Christian works for me as well with one exception. I had
to remove the file /lib/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules after creating
/etc/udev/rules.d/usbmount.rules. If I do not remove the original file,
usbmount is called twice which leads to a double mount of the usb flash
drive:
[CCs to suitable-seeming people. If you are getting this email via the
BTS too, sorry about the noise, but the BTS really should say who is
subscribed.]
Hi,
The patch by Christian Weinberger fixes the problem for me, though I don't
really understand it.
It seems this bug breaks usbmount i
Just FYI:
[How to automount optical media on Debian Linux for Kodi]
https://ddumont.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/how-to-automount-optical-media-on-debian-linux-for-kodi/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #774149 [usbmount] usbmount: Can't mount ntfs drive (Transport endpoint is
not connected)
Added tag(s) patch.
--
774149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 patch
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Christian Weinberger
wrote:
> After some more research, I found an alternative solution for this issue in
> Jessie
Nice ! I believe the code is now hosted on github. Could you please
write a pull request.
After some more research, I found an alternative solution for this issue in
Jessie
Pros:
- no changes to usbmount code necessary, no upstream dependency
- can easily be added as a fix on existing usbmount installs
- works not only for NTFS mounts, but also for long running scripts hooked by
usbm
Hi there, you all.
On Jul 29 2015, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Yes, this was one of the selling points of usbmount, since I wanted
> > something simple for my systems that *don't* have a full-blown desktop
> > environment installed (e.g.,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
>
> > Besides, I do not like the way udisks2 is creating the mountpoints. I'd
> > like my flash drive on /media/usb0 and not some unpredictable
> > /media//
>
> Yes, this was one of the selling points of usbmount, since I wanted
> something si
Hi Rogério
I would really appreciate if you keep usbmount alive.
The idea of a small tool to daemonize mount sounds interesting, but this
is one point where I am not sure. I've read an article about udev, where
it was stated, that udev should not start a daemon directly, but should
use systemd t
Dear Rogério,
I would simply say go ahead with your plan. If you are able to resolve
the issues with a new release, then nothing like it. I am already
subscribed to the package in case a new one comes out :)
Although at my end, it is also ntfs which shows the same problem as
external usb-hdd.
Til
Hi, Mathieu.
On Jul 16 2015, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > BTW, one very important question: are the problems with usbmount only
> > apparent when using fuse filesystems or are they also apparent when using
> > filesystems supported by the k
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> BTW, one very important question: are the problems with usbmount only
> apparent when using fuse filesystems or are they also apparent when using
> filesystems supported by the kernel (e.g., vfat or ext4)?
>
>
vfat & ext4 usbkey were ok for
Hi.
On Jul 08 2015, Jürgen Braun wrote:
> I don't think you can cover all functionality with udisks2. I got the
> same problem as shirish.
Yes, you guys convinced me that usbmount still has its uses.
> I was thinking about a udev rule to issue the udisksctrl command, but I
> need to know the fil
Hi.
On Jul 08 2015, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On 7/8/15, jean-marc montanier wrote:
> > If udisks2 is covering the functionalities of usbmount and has an active
> > development, may be the usbmount package should be removed from the future
> > versions of debian ?
>
> What I ended up doing was getti
Hi.
On Jul 08 2015, jean-marc montanier wrote:
> Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway
> efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks.
The basic idea behind using at is not that bad at all.
I have investigated (a very tiny bit) of the behavior of fuse mounts and the
Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
I don't think you can cover all functionality with udisks2. I got the
same problem as shirish.
I was thinking about a udev rule to issue the udisksctrl command, but I
need to know the filesystem type before the mount to be able to specify
different mount options on vf
addition at bottom :-
On 7/8/15, jean-marc montanier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway
> efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks.
>
> If udisks2 is covering the functionalities of usbmount and has an active
> development, may be the usbmount
Hi,
Just a quick message to report that the nasty workaround is anyway
efficient. It's working on my Jessie, thanks.
If udisks2 is covering the functionalities of usbmount and has an active
development, may be the usbmount package should be removed from the future
versions of debian ?
Jean-Marc
Hello,
I've got the same problem here on my system. I did a little research and
it seems, that udev is killing the mount.ntfs process after a few seconds.
I've created a litte nasty workaround using at. I think it would be a
much better way to tell udev to not kill the mount process, but I have
n
Hi all,
is udisks2 really an alternative to usbmount?
I have it installed on testing, but it doesn't automatically mount anything:
carramba@robert-desktop:/usr/share/doc/udisks2$ dmesg | tail
[ 5092.063897] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdc] 30751744 512-byte logical blocks: (15.7
GB/14.6 GiB)
[ 5092.065393] sd 4:0
Hi, Shirish.
On Jun 09 2015, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> On 6/8/15, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > In fact, I don't think that usbmount is useful anymore with udisks2 and
> > other things. Especially if you are using a desktop environment.
>
> I meant udisks2 as well as pmount, although do not know if both
In-line :-
On 6/8/15, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Hi.
Hi Rogério,
> I guess that you meant udisks2, right? If that's your situation, I guess
> that you can safely remove usbmount and use only udisks2.
>
> In fact, I don't think that usbmount is useful anymore with udisks2 and
> other things. Espec
Hi.
On Jun 07 2015, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I just got hit by few days back, got time and was able to track it down :-
> I did read the last message as well, what does that mean ? I have both
> usbdisk2 as well as usbmount.
I guess that you meant udisks2, right? If that's your situation, I guess
t
Hi all,
I just got hit by few days back, got time and was able to track it down :-
Before insertion of the external hdd
[$] ls -la /media
total 48
drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4096 Jun 7 11:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4096 Jun 6 21:51 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root6 Jul 25 2013 cdrom -> cdrom0
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #774149 [usbmount] usbmount: Can't mount ntfs drive (Transport endpoint is
not connected)
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
774149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774149
Debian Bu
In case usbmount gets removed, a linux-only alternative can be found
with udisks2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
34 matches
Mail list logo
