Hi Martin,
On 2015-01-21 11:35, Martin Pitt wrote:
> On both my Debian sid and my Ubuntu system, the only difference
> between common-session and common-session-noninteractive is that the
> latter does not include libpam-systemd.
Generally speaking, I believe (but haven't verified) that this will
Hey Christian,
Christian Kastner [2014-12-28 21:55 +0100]:
> Trying to run as a user instance, but $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is not set.
>
> I assume that this is because common-session also includes
> pam_systemd.so, whereas -noninteractive does not, so switching to the
> latter drops it from systemd-u
On 2015-01-20 19:28, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> For reference, the inclusion of common-session is a local debian
> patch[1]. The original file referenced system-auth, which apparently
> debian does not use.
>
>
> [1]
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/patches/Adj
On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:57:05 +0100 Christian Kastner wrote:
>
> If this second PAM session via systemd-user is indeed intended to be
> merely a background thing, them common-session-noninteractive should be
> the way to go anyway. But I'm not familiar enough with systemd to make
> that call.
For
4 matches
Mail list logo
