On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:57:05 +0100 Christian Kastner <deb...@kvr.at> wrote: > > If this second PAM session via systemd-user is indeed intended to be > merely a background thing, them common-session-noninteractive should be > the way to go anyway. But I'm not familiar enough with systemd to make > that call.
For reference, the inclusion of common-session is a local debian patch[1]. The original file referenced system-auth, which apparently debian does not use. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/patches/Adjust-systemd-user-pam-config-file-for-Debian.patch?id=ec748d6eba35516597182ee24d7095a9c9cf415e Saludos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
