Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> double silly me -- I see no statement in the policy that first one must
> be non-virtual, also ants package I maintain just build-depends on
> libtiff-dev and buildds were as happy... so I guess I just had a bad
> dream. Sorry about all the noise -- I will fix it all
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Let me know if I can be of any assistance in some way other than
> > reintroducing libtiff4-dev.
> doh -- blind/silly/busy? me, there is already a libtiff5-dev and what I
> need is actually to adjust build-depends to bdepend on it -- I took it
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > so when is this transition to use libtiff-dev to happen? cmtk
> > just was removed from jessie for no good reason (I have not spotted that
> > severity still was "serious"), so I wondered if I should just wait a bit
> > and upload updated package or
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> so when is this transition to use libtiff-dev to happen? cmtk
> just was removed from jessie for no good reason (I have not spotted that
> severity still was "serious"), so I wondered if I should just wait a bit
> and upload updated package or start whining process to
so when is this transition to use libtiff-dev to happen? cmtk
just was removed from jessie for no good reason (I have not spotted that
severity still was "serious"), so I wondered if I should just wait a bit
and upload updated package or start whining process to bring current
cmtk back into jessie
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > No, it's not fine. Buildds only consider the first alternative, so if
> > libtiff4-dev no longer exists, the package won't be able to build on the
> > buildds.
> and with your argument reopening those just closed issues ;)
> but for now with no
reopen 735994
reopen 736035
thanks
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Yeah, I think that should be fine. Sorry about that -- my script to find
> > all affected packages just looked for build dependencies on
> > libtiff4-dev. I didn't think to filter out the case where it was an
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 735994
Bug #735994 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko } [src:cmtk] please
build-depend on libtiff-dev, not libtiff4-dev
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #735994 to the same values
previously set
> reopen 736035
Bug #736
Hi
On 2014-07-01 12:10:30, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> > are you sure Jay? ;)
> >
> > From the beginning it had build-depends on
> >
> > libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev
> >
> > So I do not think there should be really a problem building it and at
> > best this issue is of n
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> are you sure Jay? ;)
>
> From the beginning it had build-depends on
>
> libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev
>
> So I do not think there should be really a problem building it and at
> best this issue is of normal severity to swap those bdepends order. Or am I
> wrong?
>
> I s
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Control: severity 735994 serious
> libtiff4-dev is now being removed, which will leave your package unable
> to built from source.
are you sure Jay? ;)
From the beginning it had build-depends on
libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev
So I do not think there
11 matches
Mail list logo
