On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Let me know if I can be of any assistance in some way other than > > reintroducing libtiff4-dev.
> doh -- blind/silly/busy? me, there is already a libtiff5-dev and what I > need is actually to adjust build-depends to bdepend on it -- I took it > wrong and assumed that the entire "transition" is about introducing > libtiff-dev physical package... ok, so I will just go ahead and adjust > build-depends to be > libtiff5-dev | libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, > and that should resolve it ;) double silly me -- I see no statement in the policy that first one must be non-virtual, also ants package I maintain just build-depends on libtiff-dev and buildds were as happy... so I guess I just had a bad dream. Sorry about all the noise -- I will fix it all up shortly -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
