On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 10:49:03AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I have finally removed the obsolete conflict of the mpms with mpm_itk
> in 2.4.9-2. But in order for libapache2-mpm-itk to install cleanly, it
> seems you also have to add
>
> apache2_switch_mpm prefork
>
> to your postinst bef
Hi Steinar,
I have finally removed the obsolete conflict of the mpms with mpm_itk
in 2.4.9-2. But in order for libapache2-mpm-itk to install cleanly, it
seems you also have to add
apache2_switch_mpm prefork
to your postinst before you call enmod.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 734865 apache2,libapache2-mpm-itk
Bug #734865 [libapache2-mpm-itk] libapache2-mpm-itk: fails to install:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Bug reassigned from package 'libapache2-mpm-itk' to
'apa
reassign 734865 apache2,libapache2-mpm-itk
thanks
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:35:51PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> There is some module conflict ...
Jason Rhinelander debugged this earlier today; it seems like mpm_prefork
declares a conflict with mpm_itk. But I guess the issue of mpm_event is
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #734865 [libapache2-mpm-itk] libapache2-mpm-itk: fails to install:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
734865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
severity 734865 normal
thanks
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
> a release, thus the severity.
Hi,
I am completely
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 734865 normal
Bug #734865 [libapache2-mpm-itk] libapache2-mpm-itk: fails to install:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Hi Steinar,
On 16.01.2014 21:22, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I think this is a separate issue; it was discussed when we split out mpm-itk
> as a separate package, and the general sentiment was that it will work for
> wheezy -> jessie, but not necessarily sid -> sid (the latter is not strictly
>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:05:10PM -, Eric Messick wrote:
> I encountered this bug as well.
>
> The postinstall script ends up calling:
> a2enmod -m -q mpm_itk
>
> which prints:
>
> WARNING: MPM_ITK is a third party module that is not part of the
> official Apache HTTPD. It has seen less t
I encountered this bug as well.
The postinstall script ends up calling:
a2enmod -m -q mpm_itk
which prints:
WARNING: MPM_ITK is a third party module that is not part of the
official Apache HTTPD. It has seen less testing than the official MPM
modules.
ERROR: Module mpm_event is enabled - cann
On 2014-01-10 15:15, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
>> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
>> a release, thus the severity
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
> a release, thus the severity.
Is this really legit? From the log:
invoke-rc.d:
Package: libapache2-mpm-itk
Version: 2.4.7-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + apache2-mpm-itk
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy
13 matches
Mail list logo
