On 2014-01-10 15:15, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As >> per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for >> a release, thus the severity. > > Is this really legit? From the log: > > invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of start.
That is just a disgnostic emitted while configuring apache2 or something else, not a failure. > Setting up libapache2-mpm-itk (2.4.6-01-1) ... > dpkg: error processing package libapache2-mpm-itk (--configure): > subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 I didn't dig into libapache2-mpm-itk.postinst to see where it fails silently ... > If you block starting Apache, is it really RC that the package fails to > configure? That would be the very first package requiring a running apache instance for successful installation ... so you really have to convince me that this is actually needed and the package cannot be installed while bootstrapping a chroot or virtualized installation or ... with debootstrap and friends that set up policy-rc.d similarly to piuparts. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
