Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-06-17 Thread Gianluigi Tiesi
On 06/17/13 21:27, Sam Hartman wrote: If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest. I'd recommend uploading without delay. I can't but I think it may be preferable since the landing of version in experimental may encounter some delay, krb5 is widely linked Regards -

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-06-17 Thread Sam Hartman
If you or someone else wants to NMU a solution to this, be my guest. I'd recommend uploading without delay. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote: As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update. how critical is that? do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5? I'm not entirely sure. I think that the libverto update addressed some issues with respect to dladdr() dependencies which made building diff

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
As I recall 1.11 includes a verto update. how critical is that? do I need to update debian libverto befor krb5? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
Actually, it's probably easier if I make the updates. rationale: You have your repo mixed in with something else. It makes a bit harder to construct the initial dpm state. but I can take what you have and the 1.11.2 tarball and prepsource myself and then rsync the repo into place on alioth. It p

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Sam Hartman wrote: As it turns out krb5 upstream has abandoned texinfo as their doc system. Ben kaduk has done most of the work of moving to the new upstream version so i'll do that. https://github.com/kaduk/krb5/commits/debian-1.11 is where my current version lives. Th

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog writes: Raphael> On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: >> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for >> the discussion. Raphael> Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want Raphael> to revert this chan

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707195 for the > discussion. Looks like neither upstream nor the Debian maintainers want to revert this change... So maybe this should be fixed in krb5 anyway. /me wishes that uploads were blocked if

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-17 Thread Russ Allbery
gregor herrmann writes: > Package: src:krb5 > Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > 1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=krb5&ver=1.10.1%2Bdfsg-6 See http

Bug#708711: src:krb5: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 builds on 0 architectures

2013-05-17 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: src:krb5 Version: 1.10.1+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 1.10.1+dfsg-6 FTBFS on all architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=krb5&ver=1.10.1%2Bdfsg-