Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 12:33:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#691179: fixed in trafficserver 3.2.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #691179,
regarding trafficserver: FTBFS:
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
I applied Konstantinos' patch upstream in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-1560
J
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 19:13 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> thanks for the report, but I noticed that already. I reported the
> problem to upstream [1] where it is fixed already in trunk and proposed
> as a backport to their stable branch for 3.2.x. Note, upstream's fix [2]
> is slightly different to you
Hi,
On 22.10.2012 18:59, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=trafficserver&suite=sid
>
> In lulu.h barriers are defined only for x86 and x86_64, but not for arm.
> Well, thankfully implementing barriers for arm was rather easy (at
> least, the tests pas
Package: src:trafficserver
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
(tagged serious as the package used to build for armhf previously)
In
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=trafficserver&suite=sid
In lulu.h barriers are defined only for x86 and x86_64, but not for arm.
Well,
5 matches
Mail list logo
