On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> Have you been able to test the various commands suggested by Stevan?
> Without answer from you, I will downgrade the severity of this bug.
Dear Julien,
I am sorry, but I have not. Unfortunately the issues I was encountering were
to
Hi Laurence,
Le mardi 01 nov. 2011 à 21:57:04 (+0100 CET), Stevan Bajić a écrit :
[...]
> Can you try to (keep in mind that the message will show up on the
> original date (aka 05.10.2011) in your inbox):
> cat /path/to/the/raw/message/you/sent/me | sendmail -oi l...@lwithers.me.uk
>
> Do you sti
On 01.11.2011 20:57, Laurence Withers wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
Do you have the original mail (the 6Kb version) somewhere? In raw
format? Can you send it to me or post a link to it or attach it to
this bug report?
Dear Stevan,
Hello Laurence,
I have
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> Do you have the original mail (the 6Kb version) somewhere? In raw
> format? Can you send it to me or post a link to it or attach it to
> this bug report?
Dear Stevan,
I have finally managed to track down a raw copy of the mail, which
Hello Laurence and Julien,
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007w4-3k <=
linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org H=mail2.jellyfishnet.co.uk
[93.91.20.10] P=esmtps X=TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16 S=6021
id=2a3dcf3da181ad40bde86a3150b27b6b03b4fb3...@dbde02.ent.ti.com
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007wE-9z <=
li
Hi Julien,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:36:26PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
> You use the backport, am I right?
I believe so; Squeeze backports are enabled. There was a dspam update
maybe a couple of weeks ago or so.
> Would you please describe your setup? Do you use DSPAM in daemon mode?
Sure.
Hi Laurence,
Le mercredi 05 oct. 2011 à 14:49:24 (+0200 CEST), Laurence Withers a écrit :
> Package: dspam
> Version: 3.10.1+dfs
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
>
> I have discovered that dspam is truncating inbound email after it has been
> scanned. Please consi
Package: dspam
Version: 3.10.1+dfs
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I have discovered that dspam is truncating inbound email after it has been
scanned. Please consider the size field (S=) in the following exim log
entries:
2011-10-05 01:58:48 1RBGky-0007w4-3k <= linux-o
8 matches
Mail list logo