On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> Do you have the original mail (the 6Kb version) somewhere? In raw
> format? Can you send it to me or post a link to it or attach it to
> this bug report?
Dear Stevan,
I have finally managed to track down a raw copy of the mail, which I have
attached.
I don't believe there is a way to check the size of the mail when exim
delivers it to dspam, unfortunately
Bye for now,
--
Laurence Withers, <l...@lwithers.me.uk> http://www.lwithers.me.uk/
tel:+447753988197 tel:+443333408643 sip:03333408...@03333408643.call.me.uk
>From hema...@ti.com Wed Oct 5 01:58:38 2011
Return-Path: <hema...@ti.com>
Received: from unknown (HELO bear.ext.ti.com) (192.94.94.41)
by utopia.booyaka.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Oct 2011
01:58:38 -0000
Received: from dbdp20.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.38])
by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id p951wTRl031053
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:58:31 -0500
Received: from dbde70.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dbdp20.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p951wRGf012419;
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:28:27 +0530 (IST)
Received: from dbde02.ent.ti.com ([172.24.170.145]) by dbde70.ent.ti.com
([172.24.170.148]) with mapi; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:28:27 +0530
From: "Pedanekar, Hemant" <hema...@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com>
CC: "linux-o...@vger.kernel.org" <linux-o...@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>, "Hilman, Kevin" <khil...@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 07:28:25 +0530
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] TI81XX: Add clock and hwmod data
Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] TI81XX: Add clock and hwmod data
Thread-Index: AcyCd2Lze+DQlKiNQne0MLrf9utx1wAiGsMA
Message-ID: <2a3dcf3da181ad40bde86a3150b27b6b03b4fb3...@dbde02.ent.ti.com>
References: <1314119594-22647-1-git-send-email-hema...@ti.com>
<alpine.deb.2.00.1110040318260.4...@utopia.booyaka.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.deb.2.00.1110040318260.4...@utopia.booyaka.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Hi Paul,
Paul Walmsley wrote on Tuesday, October 04, 2011 2:54 PM:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Hemant Pedanekar wrote:
>
>> This patch set is the v2 of TI816X clock and hwmods patches sent earlier.
>>
>> The clock data is currently added only for TI816X, while minimal hwmod data
>> common for TI816X and TI814X is added.
>>
>> This patch set depends on following patches:
>> TI81XX: Prepare for addition of TI814X support
>> TI814X: Add cpu type macros and detection support
>> TI814X: Create board support and enable build for TI8148 EVM
>>
>> Please note that CHIP_IS_TI816X/CHIP_IS_TI814X are still being used and I
>> will send update once SoC list usage is available.
>
> I've been spending some time with these patches. A few aspects don't make
> much sense to me. For example, looking at the TRMs, the 816x doesn't seem
> to have powerdomains for HDVICP0, 1, or 2, although they are listed in the
> patch.
Can you please check 18.2.1 in TRM from [1].
Above powerdomains are listed there as HDVICP2-0, 1, 2.
> Also, the clockdomain layout is quite different between 814x and
> 816x, according to the TRMs. Are the patches more accurate than the TRMs,
> or vice versa?
>
You are correct, 814x has differences in clock, clockdomain and powerdomain
data.
I would say the extent of differences level between 816x and 814x is
something like (please also see reference links from Arago devl tree):
Clock data: ~90% data is different (main contributors: different
PLLs - FAPLL in 816x vs ADPLL 814x, different parent hierarchy)
[2] & [3]
Clockdomains data: ~60% [4]
Powerdomains data: ~90% [5]
> Will send over the current reworked patches for TI81XX PRCM accessors,
> powerdomain code & data, and clockdomain code & data. They are intended
> to apply over the TI814x patches that you sent recently. I'd like to get
> your opinion(s) on these reworked patches. Please note, so far they have
> only been compile-tested.
>
>
> - Paul
Thanks, I will try those and respond.
Hemant
[1]
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/litabsmultiplefilelist.tsp?literatureNumber=sprugx8
[2]
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock816x_data.c;h=32ea958afef915f93e0560f87d1bb2115e24ee2c;hb=HEAD
[3]
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock814x_data.c;h=282ffa93398db678843a35766219970655563b46;hb=HEAD
[4]
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomains81xx.h;h=217c9b4f85c59cc92e0f36ddd73044136c8e9fff;hb=HEAD
[5]
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-omap3.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains81xx.h;h=ef1299e00c216aea4d12bca2281540efb7eb77f0;hb=HEAD
