Bug#622800: trafficserver: FTBFS on architectures not supported upstream

2011-04-14 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Arno Töll writes: > I am working on kfreebsd support right now, which should be rather > straightforward to port. The x86 issue is already fixed, see below. I > will talk to upstream whether they see a possibility to support the > remaining architectures that failed or change the architecture fie

Bug#622800: trafficserver: FTBFS on architectures not supported upstream

2011-04-14 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 14.04.2011 20:41, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > trafficserver only has a chance of building on the handful of > architectures upstream supports: i386, amd64, armel, and the upcoming > armhf. Unless you care to add support for the others, please set i

Bug#622800: trafficserver: FTBFS on architectures not supported upstream

2011-04-14 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: trafficserver Version: 2.1.5-unstable-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source trafficserver only has a chance of building on the handful of architectures upstream supports: i386, amd64, armel, and the upcoming armhf. Unless you care to add support for the others, pl