Arno Töll <deb...@toell.net> writes: > I am working on kfreebsd support right now, which should be rather > straightforward to port. The x86 issue is already fixed, see below. I > will talk to upstream whether they see a possibility to support the > remaining architectures that failed or change the architecture field for > upcoming uploads as suggested.
Sounds great; thanks! BTW, please note that Debian hasn't entirely given up on the Hurd just yet, so you will likely still need to exclude it explicitly. > I'm aware. This is an upstream issue I reported today, as I tracked the > problem [1]. This seems to be an architecture dependent problem within > the test suite. Maybe I will disable regression checks for now, since > compilation and runtime itself seem to run just fine. That's fair, as long as you're reasonably confident that the actual binary should still work. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
