On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:58:51PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Too late now for [#583183] ... I now noticed that imagemagick also
uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-.
Do *NOT* "cross-post" bug info between bugreports! ...
You do *not* help if "spamming" the b
Dear Jonas,
Sorry, but do not understand.
>>Too late now for [#583183] ... I now noticed that imagemagick
>>also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-.
>
> Do *NOT* "cross-post" bug info between bugreports! ...
> You do *not* help if "spamming" the bugreports. :-(
I wanted
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:36:39AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Too late now for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183#54
(as that is archived, un-changeable). I now noticed that imagemagick
also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-.
Do *NOT*
Too late now for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183#54
(as that is archived, un-changeable). I now noticed that imagemagick
also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-.
Good thing this bug is now "fixed". (I will not report a bug against
imagemagick, no n
4 matches
Mail list logo
