On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 01:58:51PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Too late now for [#583183] ... I now noticed that imagemagick also uses gs, and invokes it with -dPARANOIDSAFER but without -P-.Do *NOT* "cross-post" bug info between bugreports! ... You do *not* help if "spamming" the bugreports. :-(I wanted to point out in this bug #584663 that imagemagick is affected by it. Only in passing I bemoaned the fact that the "definitive list" of affected packages cannot be updated in #583183.
Oh, ok. Sorry for shouting.
not certain yet whether the fix will make it into squeeze
True, it is uncertain: Certainty is when it is actually there. I clarified the possible futures already in a different mail.
(why not into lenny, via a DSA? lesser issues were given DSAs)
Lack of manpower.You are quite welcome to try isolate and propose patches for each of the issues. That raises the likelyhood of the bugs getting fixed there too.
But again: no promise - we are all just volunteers here. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
