is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
516336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516336
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message
w days in
this bug log, see sub-thread starting at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516336#32
Bottom line: we first need to complete the transition to latest ghc on
the remaining architectures.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z.
Hi zack,
Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 10:30 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Em Dom, 2010-01-31 às 11:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu:
> (...)
> > It looks like we have a problem then. At the bottom of this mail you can
> > find the output of a (dry-run-mode) attempt of removing
Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> Ciao Stefano.
>
> Em Dom, 2010-01-31 às 11:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu:
> (...)
>> It looks like we have a problem then. At the bottom of this mail you can
>> find the output of a (dry-run-mode) attempt of removing haskell-utils
>> from the archive.
Ciao Stefano.
Em Dom, 2010-01-31 às 11:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu:
(...)
> It looks like we have a problem then. At the bottom of this mail you can
> find the output of a (dry-run-mode) attempt of removing haskell-utils
> from the archive. There are 24 packages in unstable which still
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:10:32PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> indeed, haskell-utils is not used any more, as almost all packages are
> using haskell-devscripts by now. Igloo has orphaned all his
> haskell-related packages, but nobody else dared yet to request removal
> of haskell-utils :-). I
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 13:18 +0100 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> More generally, I'm not sure that this package is still in use
> anymore. It used to be a dependency of ghc6, but it is no longer one. It
> is still a dependency of hmake, but in turn I'm not sure whether the
> latter is the
Ciao Stefano.
Dom, 2010-01-24 às 13:18 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:00:38AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > update-haskell-control.lhs:190:13:
> > Not in scope: `readPackageDescription'
> >
> > update-haskell-control.lhs:192:15:
> > Not in scope: `fl
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:00:38AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> update-haskell-control.lhs:190:13:
> Not in scope: `readPackageDescription'
>
> update-haskell-control.lhs:192:15:
> Not in scope: `flattenPackageDescription'
> make[1]: *** [update-haskell-control] Error 1
> make[1]: Leavi
Hi,
I gave it a shot to fix this but it seems like it's not at easy as I
expected seeing my limited knowledge of haskell. Nevertheless I found
that the bug is caused by important changes in the Cabal API from
1.2.4.0 (in ghc6 6.8.2 - testing) to 1.6.0.1 (in ghc6 6.10 -
unstable).
Alex Tudor
--
Package: haskell-utils
Version: 1.11
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
debian/rules build
dh_testdir
/usr/bin/make prefix=/usr localstatedir=/var/lib
11 matches
Mail list logo
