Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > Ciao Stefano. > > Em Dom, 2010-01-31 às 11:43 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli escreveu: > (...) >> It looks like we have a problem then. At the bottom of this mail you can >> find the output of a (dry-run-mode) attempt of removing haskell-utils >> from the archive. There are 24 packages in unstable which still depend >> on haskell-utils, so it can't be removed naively. > >>From what I could see, all these packages, excluding hmake, only depends > on haskell-utils in hurd-i386, ia64 and m68k, which are platforms where > ghc6 was not upgraded to the current version. > >> What are your (as in debian-haskell) plans about this? I see only two >> possibilities: or you envisage migrating all such packages to >> haskell-devscripts (modulo some transitive removals of some of them) > > We've done this already for all listed packages but hmake. As no one > replied till now about the use of hmake, I think it should be removed > too. > > I think the main problem here is the upgrade of ghc6 on these three > architectures. I'll investigate on this issue.
The main problem is indeed that currently not a single Haskell package is ready for the release due to ghc6 not being up-to-date on ia64 AFAICS. ghc6 6.12 which should fix this issue was uploaded to experimental. I hope an upload to unstable will follow soon so that hopefully the whole lot of Haskell packages will be ready before the freeze! Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
