Bug#480431: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#480431: Bug#480431: Bug#480431: octaviz: Segfault on AMD64

* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-21 22:53]: > 2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > > > >> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: > >> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Her

Bug#480431: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#480431: Bug#480431: octaviz: Segfault on AMD64

2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > >> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: >> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> > > Package: octaviz >> > > Version: 0.4.7-1 >> > > Severity:

Bug#480431: octaviz: Segfault on AMD64

* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-05 21:57]: > So, my "solution" would be: patch vtk_surf() to check for NaN and error out > if it finds them. Could you do it, please? What about downgrading the severity of Bug#480431, before octaviz get kicked off lenny? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#480431: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#480431: Bug#480431: Bug#480431: octaviz: Segfault on AMD64

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:15:07PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > > > Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: > > > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > > > > Package: octaviz > > > > Version: 0

Bug#480431: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#480431: Bug#480431: octaviz: Segfault on AMD64

* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: > > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > > > Package: octaviz > > > Version: 0.4.7-1 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > With the attached script and data,