2008/9/5 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 09:11]: > >> Am Samstag, den 10.05.2008, 07:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: >> > On 09/05/08 18:34 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> > > Package: octaviz >> > > Version: 0.4.7-1 >> > > Severity: important >> > > >> > > With the attached script and data, Octaviz segfaults on AMD64. >> > >> > As I discussed with Jordi earlier: this is arch-specific, it doesn't >> > happen on i386. >> >> I've tracked this back till line 271 of vtkClipPolyData.cxx, where >> cellScalars->GetComponent(1,0) >> is a NaN value. > > Should this bug be considered release-critical, as it is now (severity level > "serious")?
Oops, I just saw this. Way after it mattered, since Thomas already fixed the bug. But yeah, segfaults are very embarrassing. I do personally think they are RC. - Jordi G. H. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
