severity 449497 important
thanks
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:40:34 pm Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> > [3] not that I checked with such printers, I'm only in touch with one
> > that needs a non-free firmware
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466758#15
>
> So you
Hi Luca,
> [3] not that I checked with such printers, I'm only in touch with one
> that needs a non-free firmware
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=466758#15
So you don't think that your usage of the package is more "contrib"
then "main"?
Personally I find it a rathe
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:12:49 pm Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:03:46 +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:38:51 +0100. Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> >> I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation.
> >> If I take policy literar
Hi there!
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:03:46 +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:38:51 +0100. Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
>> I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation. If I
>> take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it is not
>> as si
On Sunday 26 October 2008 08:03:46 Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi
>
> > I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation. If
> > I take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it is
> > not as simple...
> >
> > In order to get this bug rolling (and lenny released
Hi
Sorry for the confusing statement here.
> > > I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation.
> > > If I take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it
> > > is not as simple...
> > >
> > > In order to get this bug rolling (and lenny released ;-) ), ca
Hi
> I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation. If I
> take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it is not
> as simple...
>
> In order to get this bug rolling (and lenny released ;-) ), can you all
> live with me splitting up the package in two pack
Hello all,
>
> ok, my point is that dependencies on external data/files are
> potentially dangerous. if the maintainer of the upstream site makes
> changes (as has been done in the past with foo2zjs), then the package
> no longer works as intended. if someone replaces the upstream files
> with m
Hello,
README.Debian of "foo2zjs" provides the following text:
foo2zjs for Debian
---
Please understand that I had to delete some files which the author is
still providing, because I got no source code for them.
This is necessary to get the package into Debian main.
If you really ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 449497 wishlist
Bug#449497: foo2zjs: application depends on non-free firmware
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> tags 449497 wontfix
Bug#449497: foo2zjs: application depends on non-free firmware
There were no tags
severity 449497 wishlist
tags 449497 wontfix
thanks
Hi Michael
To the best of my knowledge, not all printers need this firmware. Thus, the
package is operational without additional firmware. Unfortunately, some
printers need firmware, that is right. Please feel free to ask hp or the
other prin
Package: foo2zjs
Version: 20070718dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
foo2zjs relies heavily upon non-free firmware that is hosted at the
upstream site. this behavior, i believe, does not adhere to the spirit of
the debian policy for software in main (packages should not require
12 matches
Mail list logo
