Hi Sorry for the confusing statement here. > > > I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a "grey" area situation. > > > If I take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it > > > is not as simple... > > > > > > In order to get this bug rolling (and lenny released ;-) ), can you all > > > live with me splitting up the package in two packages: > > > > > > 1) foo2zjs: this contains everything, and lives in mains, which > > > Suggests: 2) foo2zjs-contrib: this contains getweb > > > > > > I know a package with just a script is not nice, but it is more in the > > > spirit of the debian policy indeed. > > > > I would like to hear Michael's word on it, since he was the more active > > one during the last uploads. In fact, I am happy to give up > > maintainership, as this package (and the tiresome discussion around it) > > is really no fun. This refers to Michael Koch (also maintainer of the package).
> > Maybe Michael would like to step in and help out maintaining the package? Here I mean the submitter :) > That would be great. It is indeed not my intention at all to step on your > toes, I'm just your friendly lenny pusher ;) I know, it's just a big frustration to deal with this package :/ Thanks for your work on the release and caring about RC bugs. Cheers Steffen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
