also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.19.1639 +0200]:
> One other thing to add... I went back and looked at the maildir
> manpage, and I believe that the OfflineIMAP implementation, even
> prior to your patch, is conformant to the spec.
Yes, it was.
> Ordinarily it would seem lik
also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.19.1623 +0200]:
> It looks like your Maildir code may have introduced an infinite loop. Would
> you be able to look into this, or should I just revert the patch?
I don't know when I will get a chance to look at this in detail, so
for now, jus
On Fri October 19 2007 9:23:05 am John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> It looks like your Maildir code may have introduced an infinite loop.
> Would you be able to look into this, or should I just revert the patch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- John
One other thing to add... I went back and looked at the
Hi Martin,
It looks like your Maildir code may have introduced an infinite loop. Would
you be able to look into this, or should I just revert the patch?
Thanks,
-- John
--- Begin Message ---
Package: offlineimap
Version: 5.99.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
offlinei
Package: offlineimap
Version: 5.99.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
offlineimap just spins. Enabling debug messages spews the
following with ever increasing names:
> DEBUG[maildir]: savemessage: using temporary name 1192761387_46.20753.nan
Looks like the race condition
5 matches
Mail list logo
