also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.19.1639 +0200]: > One other thing to add... I went back and looked at the maildir > manpage, and I believe that the OfflineIMAP implementation, even > prior to your patch, is conformant to the spec.
Yes, it was. > Ordinarily it would seem like there is a race here, but I wonder > if some of the other rules for access make it a non-issue here. > I haven't had the chance to look at it in detail yet though. There was certainly a race condition there. I don't have the time to check this now though, so it's best if you just revert the patch... Btw: I did test offlineimap with the patch and it worked fine for me. Now it also spinloops. I have no idea what's going on. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems review of a chemistry paper: "paper should be greatly reduced or completely oxidized." -- frank vastola
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
