tags 425781 pending
tags 425813 pending
thanks
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> So in fact this *IS* enough as it is by now, do you agree?
Yes.
>> I checked in the following code:
>> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
>>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425781 pending
Bug#425781: upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390)
There were no tags set.
Bug#425813: texlive-base: upgrade fails with 'fmtutil-sys failed'
Bug#425993: jadetex: fails to configure
Tags added: pending
> tags
On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> So in fact this *IS* enough as it is by now, do you agree?
>
> I checked in the following code:
> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
> echo "It looks like $cfgfile has been removed."
> echo "In most cases this is a consequence
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Or re-instantiate all config files, ie do not delete any but
> > echo/debconf a warning to re-delete it.
> >
> > The former would have a trivial and quick implementation.
>
> With a version check, so that it only happens once, I think it's the way
> to
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable, except that it might be better to use debconf
>> for this. Moreover, for the really mandatory files, like
>> pdftexconfig.tex and modes.mf, we should not just leave it to the user
>>
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> That sounds reasonable, except that it might be better to use debconf
> for this. Moreover, for the really mandatory files, like
> pdftexconfig.tex and modes.mf, we should not just leave it to the user
> and continue. Instead we should either forcibly re
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
> echo "It looks like $cfgfile has been removed."
> echo "If you didn't do this it could be bug #420390."
> echo "If you had tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-5 installed and purged it,"
> echo
Dear Kohda-san,
nice to hear you again, it was quite some time we didn't get into
contact!
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > This bug is solved now, but for those who already did purge, the only
> > solution is to reinstall the texlive packages (in particular
> > texlive-base and tex
On Thu, 24 May 2007 10:28:48 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> I think you all got bitten by #420390, "Purging tetex transition
> packages removes texlive configuration files".
>
> This bug is solved now, but for those who already did purge, the only
> solution is to reinstall the texlive packages (in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Joerg Platte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 schrieb Joerg Platte:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > after installing all texlive updates from today with --force-confmis
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:11:55AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Joerg Platte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 schrieb Joerg Platte:
> > Hello,
> >
> > after installing all texlive updates from today with --force-confmiss I
> > noticed that two config files from texlive
Joerg Platte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 schrieb Joerg Platte:
> Hello,
>
> after installing all texlive updates from today with --force-confmiss I
> noticed that two config files from texlive-latex-base were missing, too:
Yes, the packages affected are at least
te
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 schrieb Joerg Platte:
Hello,
after installing all texlive updates from today with --force-confmiss I
noticed that two config files from texlive-latex-base were missing, too:
Setting up texlive-latex-base (2007-7) ...
Configuration file `/etc/texmf/tex/latex/config/co
Am Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 schrieb Frank Küster:
Hello,
> I think you all got bitten by #420390, "Purging tetex transition
> packages removes texlive configuration files".
>
> This bug is solved now, but for those who already did purge, the only
> solution is to reinstall the texlive packages (in
Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: texlive-base
> Version: 2007-7
> Followup-For: Bug #425781
>
> Hallo! The upgrade of texlive-base fails for me too. I do not have the
> following files on my system:
>
> /etc/texmf/metafont/misc/modes.mf
> /etc/texmf/tex/generic/conf
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007-7
Followup-For: Bug #425781
Hallo! The upgrade of texlive-base fails for me too. I do not have the
following files on my system:
/etc/texmf/metafont/misc/modes.mf
/etc/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
The failed post-installation script left me the fo
16 matches
Mail list logo
